ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, MCS Building M316 University of Western Australia.
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Nov 24;10:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-262.
Arabidopsis thaliana is clearly established as the model plant species. Given the ever-growing demand for food, there is a need to translate the knowledge learned in Arabidopsis to agronomically important species, such as rice (Oryza sativa). To gain a comparative insight into the similarities and differences into how organs are built and how plants respond to stress, the transcriptomes of Arabidopsis and rice were compared at the level of gene orthology and functional categorisation.
Organ specific transcripts in rice and Arabidopsis display less overlap in terms of gene orthology compared to the orthology observed between both genomes. Although greater overlap in terms of functional classification was observed between root specific transcripts in rice and Arabidopsis, this did not extend to flower, leaf or seed specific transcripts. In contrast, the overall abiotic stress response transcriptome displayed a significantly greater overlap in terms of gene orthology compared to the orthology observed between both genomes. However, ~50% or less of these orthologues responded in a similar manner in both species. In fact, under cold and heat treatments as many or more orthologous genes responded in an opposite manner or were unchanged in one species compared to the other. Examples of transcripts that responded oppositely include several genes encoding proteins involved in stress and redox responses and non-symbiotic hemoglobins that play central roles in stress signalling pathways. The differences observed in the abiotic transcriptomes were mirrored in the presence of cis-acting regulatory elements in the promoter regions of stress responsive genes and the transcription factors that potentially bind these regulatory elements. Thus, both the abiotic transcriptome and its regulation differ between rice and Arabidopsis.
These results reveal significant divergence between Arabidopsis and rice, in terms of the abiotic stress response and its regulation. Both plants are shown to employ unique combinations of genes to achieve growth and stress responses. Comparison of these networks provides a more rational approach to translational studies that is based on the response observed in these two diverse plant models.
拟南芥显然已成为模式植物物种。鉴于人们对食物的需求不断增长,有必要将在拟南芥中获得的知识转化为农业上重要的物种,例如水稻(Oryza sativa)。为了深入了解器官构建方式以及植物对胁迫的反应方式的异同,我们比较了拟南芥和水稻的转录组在基因直系同源和功能分类水平上的相似性。
与两个基因组之间观察到的直系同源性相比,水稻和拟南芥中器官特异性转录本的基因直系同源性重叠较少。尽管在根特异性转录本之间观察到功能分类上更大的重叠,但这种重叠并未扩展到花、叶或种子特异性转录本。相比之下,非生物胁迫响应转录组在基因直系同源性方面表现出更大的重叠,与两个基因组之间观察到的直系同源性相比。然而,这些直系同源物中只有约 50%或更少的以相似的方式在两个物种中响应。实际上,在冷和热处理下,与另一个物种相比,许多或更多的同源基因以相反的方式或未发生变化。响应方式相反的转录本的例子包括几种编码参与胁迫和氧化还原反应的蛋白质的基因以及在胁迫信号通路中起核心作用的非共生血红蛋白。在胁迫响应基因启动子区域中观察到的差异也反映了非生物转录组的差异顺式作用调节元件和潜在结合这些调节元件的转录因子。因此,水稻和拟南芥的非生物转录组及其调控存在差异。
这些结果表明,在非生物胁迫响应及其调控方面,拟南芥和水稻之间存在显著差异。两种植物都表现出独特的基因组合,以实现生长和胁迫响应。对这些网络的比较为基于这两个不同植物模型中观察到的响应的转化研究提供了更合理的方法。