Department of Dental Hygiene, Eastern Washington University, 310 North Riverpoint, Box E, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2010 Dec;74(12):1337-50.
One challenge facing dental hygiene, as well as dental, education is to identify clinical teaching strategies promoting critical thinking and clinical reasoning. These skills are crucial elements in the practice of dental hygiene. A two-group design (intervention, n=28, and control, n=30) assessed first-year dental hygiene students using pre-and post-Health Science Reasoning Test (HSRT) scores to evaluate the effect of reflective blogging on critical thinking skills. A reflective blog rubric, based on Mezirow's levels of reflection, determined if reflective blogging increased the level of reflection for dental hygiene students. The results suggest within this nonprobability sample that reflective blogging did not produce a significant change in students' HSRT scores (p>0.05). However, analyses of reflective blog rubric scores demonstrated statistically significant improvements (p<0.05) in students' levels of reflection. Furthermore, data analysis revealed a correlation (p<0.05) between HSRT subscale scores and the element of reflection scores for the intervention group. This study addressed needs of the dental and dental hygiene education community by examining the use of blogs, an emerging technology, as a tool for reflecting on clinical experiences and, in turn, for promoting critical thinking.
口腔卫生教育面临的一个挑战是确定促进批判性思维和临床推理的临床教学策略。这些技能是口腔卫生实践的关键要素。一项采用两组设计(干预组,n=28;对照组,n=30)的研究使用健康科学推理测试(HSRT)的前后测分数评估了一年级口腔卫生专业学生,以评估反思博客对批判性思维技能的影响。基于 Mezirow 反思层次的反思博客评分标准确定了反思博客是否提高了口腔卫生学生的反思水平。结果表明,在这个非概率样本中,反思博客并没有显著改变学生的 HSRT 分数(p>0.05)。然而,反思博客评分标准的分析显示,学生的反思水平有统计学意义上的提高(p<0.05)。此外,数据分析显示,干预组的 HSRT 分量表分数与反思要素分数之间存在相关性(p<0.05)。本研究通过检查博客(一种新兴技术)作为反思临床经验的工具的使用,满足了牙科和牙科健康教育界的需求,从而促进了批判性思维。