Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Korea.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 May;30(5):1076-89. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2097275. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
We propose a novel statistical analysis method for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to overcome the drawbacks of conventional data-driven methods such as the independent component analysis (ICA). Although ICA has been broadly applied to fMRI due to its capacity to separate spatially or temporally independent components, the assumption of independence has been challenged by recent studies showing that ICA does not guarantee independence of simultaneously occurring distinct activity patterns in the brain. Instead, sparsity of the signal has been shown to be more promising. This coincides with biological findings such as sparse coding in V1 simple cells, electrophysiological experiment results in the human medial temporal lobe, etc. The main contribution of this paper is, therefore, a new data driven fMRI analysis that is derived solely based upon the sparsity of the signals. A compressed sensing based data-driven sparse generalized linear model is proposed that enables estimation of spatially adaptive design matrix as well as sparse signal components that represent synchronous, functionally organized and integrated neural hemodynamics. Furthermore, a minimum description length (MDL)-based model order selection rule is shown to be essential in selecting unknown sparsity level for sparse dictionary learning. Using simulation and real fMRI experiments, we show that the proposed method can adapt individual variation better compared to the conventional ICA methods.
我们提出了一种新的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)统计分析方法,以克服传统数据驱动方法(如独立成分分析(ICA))的缺点。尽管由于能够分离空间或时间独立成分,ICA 已被广泛应用于 fMRI,但最近的研究表明,独立假设并不保证大脑中同时发生的不同活动模式的独立性,这一假设受到了挑战。相反,信号的稀疏性被证明更有前途。这与生物发现(如 V1 简单细胞中的稀疏编码)、人类内侧颞叶的电生理实验结果等相吻合。因此,本文的主要贡献是一种新的基于数据的 fMRI 分析方法,该方法完全基于信号的稀疏性。提出了一种基于压缩感知的数据驱动稀疏广义线性模型,能够估计空间自适应设计矩阵以及表示同步、功能组织和集成神经血液动力学的稀疏信号分量。此外,基于最小描述长度(MDL)的模型阶数选择规则对于稀疏字典学习中选择未知的稀疏水平至关重要。通过仿真和真实 fMRI 实验,我们表明与传统的 ICA 方法相比,所提出的方法可以更好地适应个体差异。