Suppr超能文献

单独或联合使用 EASL、RECIST 和 WHO 反应指南在肝细胞癌中的作用:放射病理相关性。

Role of the EASL, RECIST, and WHO response guidelines alone or in combination for hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2011 Apr;54(4):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We sought to study receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for assessing response following locoregional therapies individually and in various combinations.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent liver explantation following locoregional therapies. Response was assessed using EASL, RECIST, and WHO. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-method agreement. Uni/multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the variables predicting complete pathologic necrosis. Numerical values were assigned to the response classes: complete response=0, partial response=1, stable disease=2, and progressive disease=3. Various mathematical combinations of EASL and WHO were tested to calculate scores and their ROCs were studied using pathological examination of the explant as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Median times (95% CI) to the WHO, RECIST, and EASL responses were 5.3 (4-11.5), 5.6 (4-11.5), and 1.3months (1.2-1.5), respectively. Kappa coefficients for WHO/RECIST, WHO/EASL, and RECIST/EASL were 0.78, 0.28, and 0.31, respectively. EASL response demonstrated significant odds ratios for predicting complete pathologic necrosis on uni/multivariate analyses. Calculated areas under the ROC curves were: RECIST: 0.63, WHO: 0.68, EASL: 0.82, EASL+WHO: 0.82, EASL×WHO: 0.85, EASL+(2×WHO): 0.79 and (2×EASL)+WHO: 0.85. An EASL×WHO Score of ⩽1 had 90.2% sensitivity for predicting complete pathologic necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The product of WHO and EASL demonstrated better ROC than the individual guidelines for assessment of tumor response. EASL×WHO scoring system provides a simple and clinically applicable method of response assessment following locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

摘要

背景与目的

我们旨在分别和联合研究欧洲肝脏研究协会(EASL)、实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)和世界卫生组织(WHO)指南用于评估局部区域治疗后反应的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

方法

81 例肝细胞癌患者在接受局部区域治疗后进行肝切除术。采用 EASL、RECIST 和 WHO 方法评估反应。使用 Kappa 统计量确定方法间的一致性。进行单变量/多变量逻辑回归分析以确定预测完全病理坏死的变量。将反应类别赋值为:完全缓解=0,部分缓解=1,疾病稳定=2,疾病进展=3。测试了 EASL 和 WHO 的各种数学组合以计算评分,并使用肝切除标本的病理检查作为金标准来研究 ROC。

结果

中位时间(95%CI)达到 WHO、RECIST 和 EASL 反应的时间分别为 5.3(4-11.5)、5.6(4-11.5)和 1.3 个月(1.2-1.5)。WHO/RECIST、WHO/EASL 和 RECIST/EASL 的 Kappa 系数分别为 0.78、0.28 和 0.31。EASL 反应在单变量/多变量分析中对预测完全病理坏死具有显著的优势比。ROC 曲线下面积为:RECIST:0.63,WHO:0.68,EASL:0.82,EASL+WHO:0.82,EASL×WHO:0.85,EASL+(2×WHO):0.79 和(2×EASL)+WHO:0.85。EASL×WHO ⩽1 的评分对预测完全病理坏死具有 90.2%的敏感性。

结论

WHO 和 EASL 的乘积比用于评估肿瘤反应的单独指南具有更好的 ROC。EASL×WHO 评分系统为局部区域治疗后评估肝细胞癌提供了一种简单且适用于临床的反应评估方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Evaluation of liver tumour response by imaging.通过影像学评估肝肿瘤反应。
JHEP Rep. 2020 Apr 28;2(3):100100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100100. eCollection 2020 Jun.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验