Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):785-95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1280-6. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
The goal of this study was to determine whether gene expression differences exist between inflammatory breast cancers (IBC) and T stage-matched non-IBC patients stratified by hormone receptor and HER2 status. We used Affymetrix GeneChips to analyze 82 tumor samples (25 T4d patients, and 57 T4a-c patients) of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Genes that were differentially expressed between the IBC and non-IBC specimens were identified using the t test, and differential expression of gene sets was assessed using gene set analysis. Three distinct clinical subtypes of IBC and non-IBC were compared: ER-positive/HER2-normal, HER2-amplified, and ER-negative/HER2-normal. When we compared expression data from all IBC with all non-IBC, we found no significant differences after adjusting for multiple testing. When IBC and non-IBC tumors were compared by clinical subtype, however, significant differences emerged. Complement and immune system-related pathways were overexpressed in ER-positive/HER2-normal IBC. Protein translation and mTOR signaling were overexpressed in HER2-amplified IBC. Apoptosis-, neural-, and lipid metabolism-related pathways were overexpressed in ER-negative/HER2-normal IBC compared with non-IBC of the same receptor phenotype. In this T stage-matched case-control study, the survival curves of patients with IBC and non-IBC were similar for all three clinical subtypes. IBC tumors can be divided into molecular and clinical subtypes similar to those of non-IBC. Clinical subtypes of IBC show molecular differences compared with similar subtypes of non-IBC.
本研究旨在确定激素受体和 HER2 状态分层的炎性乳腺癌(IBC)和 T 期匹配的非 IBC 患者之间是否存在基因表达差异。我们使用 Affymetrix GeneChips 分析了 82 例新诊断乳腺癌肿瘤样本(25 例 T4d 患者和 57 例 T4a-c 患者)。使用 t 检验鉴定 IBC 和非 IBC 标本之间差异表达的基因,并使用基因集分析评估基因集的差异表达。比较了三种不同的 IBC 和非 IBC 临床亚型:ER 阳性/HER2 正常、HER2 扩增和 ER 阴性/HER2 正常。当我们比较所有 IBC 的表达数据与所有非 IBC 的表达数据时,在进行多次检验调整后,未发现显着差异。然而,当按临床亚型比较 IBC 和非 IBC 肿瘤时,出现了显着差异。在 ER 阳性/HER2 正常的 IBC 中,补体和免疫系统相关途径过度表达。在 HER2 扩增的 IBC 中,蛋白质翻译和 mTOR 信号通路过度表达。与相同受体表型的非 IBC 相比,ER 阴性/HER2 正常的 IBC 中与凋亡、神经和脂质代谢相关的途径过度表达。在这种 T 期匹配的病例对照研究中,IBC 和非 IBC 患者的生存曲线在所有三种临床亚型中均相似。IBC 肿瘤可以分为与非 IBC 相似的分子和临床亚型。与非 IBC 相似的亚型相比,IBC 的临床亚型表现出分子差异。