Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, 3084, Australia.
J Neurol. 2011 May;258(5):855-61. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5853-4. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
Acute vestibular syndrome may be due to vestibular neuritis (VN) or posterior circulation strokes. Bedside ocular motor testing performed by experts is superior to early MRI in excluding strokes. We sought to demonstrate that differentiation of strokes from VN in our stroke unit is reliable. During a prospective study at a tertiary hospital over 1 year, patients with AVS were evaluated in the emergency department (ED) and underwent admission with targeted examination: gait, gaze-holding, horizontal head impulse test (hHIT), testing for skew deviation (SD) and vertical smooth pursuit (vSP). Neuroimaging included CT, transcranial Doppler (TCD) and MRI with MR angiogram (MRA). VN was diagnosed with normal diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and absence of neurological deficits on follow-up. Acute strokes were confirmed with DWI. A total of 24 patients with AVS were enrolled and divided in two groups. In the pure vestibular group (n = 20), all VN (n = 10/10) had positive hHIT and unidirectional nystagmus, but 1 patient had SD and abnormal vertical smooth pursuit (SP). In all the strokes (n = 10/10), one of the following signs suggestive of central lesion was present: negative hHIT, central-type nystagmus, SD or abnormal vSP. Finding one of these was 100% sensitive and 90% specific for stroke. In the cochleovestibular group (n = 4) all had normal DWI, but 3 patients had central ocular motor signs (abnormal vertical SP and SD). Whilst the study is small, classification of AVS in our stroke unit is reliable. The sensitivity and specificity of bedside ocular motor testing are comparable to those previously reported by expert neuro-otologists. Acute cochleovestibular loss and normal DWI may signify a labyrinthine infarct but differentiating between different causes of inner ear dysfunction is not possible with bedside testing.
急性前庭综合征可能由前庭神经炎(VN)或后循环卒中引起。专家进行的床边眼动测试在排除卒中方面优于早期 MRI。我们旨在证明我们卒中单元中区分卒中与 VN 的方法是可靠的。在一家三级医院进行的前瞻性研究中,在 1 年期间,急诊部(ED)评估 AVS 患者,并进行入院针对性检查:步态、凝视、水平头脉冲试验(hHIT)、检测偏斜(SD)和垂直平滑追踪(vSP)。神经影像学包括 CT、经颅多普勒(TCD)和 MRI 加磁共振血管造影(MRA)。VN 通过正常弥散加权图像(DWI)和随访中无神经功能缺损来诊断。急性卒中标记为 DWI。共纳入 24 例 AVS 患者,分为两组。在单纯前庭组(n=20)中,所有 VN(n=10/10)均有阳性 hHIT 和单向眼震,但 1 例有 SD 和异常垂直平滑追踪(vSP)。在所有卒中(n=10/10)中,以下提示中央病变的体征之一存在:阴性 hHIT、中央型眼震、SD 或异常 vSP。发现其中之一的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 90%。在耳蜗前庭组(n=4)中,所有 DWI 正常,但 3 例有中央眼动体征(异常垂直 vSP 和 SD)。尽管研究规模较小,但我们卒中单元中 AVS 的分类是可靠的。床边眼动测试的敏感性和特异性与先前专家神经耳科医生报告的相似。急性耳蜗前庭损失和正常 DWI 可能提示迷路梗死,但床边测试无法区分内耳功能障碍的不同原因。