• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择亲属进行失踪人员的DNA鉴定。

Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons.

作者信息

Ge Jianye, Budowle Bruce, Chakraborty Ranajit

机构信息

Institute of Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56 Suppl 1:S23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01631.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01631.x
PMID:21155801
Abstract

DNA-based analysis is integral to missing person identification cases. When direct references are not available, indirect relative references can be used to identify missing persons by kinship analysis. Generally, more reference relatives render greater accuracy of identification. However, it is costly to type multiple references. Thus, at times, decisions may need to be made on which relatives to type. In this study, pedigrees for 37 common reference scenarios with 13 CODIS STRs were simulated to rank the information content of different combinations of relatives. The results confirm that first-order relatives (parents and fullsibs) are the most preferred relatives to identify missing persons; fullsibs are also informative. Less genetic dependence between references provides a higher on average likelihood ratio. Distant relatives may not be helpful solely by autosomal markers. But lineage-based Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA markers can increase the likelihood ratio or serve as filters to exclude putative relationships.

摘要

基于DNA的分析对于失踪人员身份鉴定案件至关重要。当无法获得直接参考样本时,可以通过亲缘关系分析使用间接的亲属参考样本以识别失踪人员。一般来说,更多的参考亲属会使鉴定准确性更高。然而,对多个参考样本进行分型成本很高。因此,有时可能需要决定对哪些亲属进行分型。在本研究中,模拟了37种常见参考情况的家系,使用13个CODIS STR进行分析,以对不同亲属组合的信息含量进行排序。结果证实,一级亲属(父母和同胞)是识别失踪人员的首选亲属;同胞也具有参考价值。参考样本之间较低的遗传相关性平均提供了更高的似然比。仅依靠常染色体标记,远亲可能没有帮助。但基于谱系的Y染色体和线粒体DNA标记可以增加似然比或作为排除假定关系的筛选工具。

相似文献

1
Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons.选择亲属进行失踪人员的DNA鉴定。
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56 Suppl 1:S23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01631.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
2
Disaster victim investigation recommendations from two simulated mass disaster scenarios utilized for user acceptance testing CODIS 6.0.利用 CODIS 6.0 进行用户验收测试的两个模拟大规模灾难场景中的灾难受害者调查建议。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Aug;5(4):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
3
DNA identification of "Earthquake McGoon" 50 years postmortem.“地震麦贡”死后50年的DNA鉴定
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Sep;52(5):1115-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00506.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
4
DNA typing for the identification of old skeletal remains from Korean War victims.用于鉴定朝鲜战争受害者陈旧骨骼遗骸的DNA分型
J Forensic Sci. 2010 Nov;55(6):1422-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01411.x.
5
Individual genetic identification of biological samples: a case of an aircraft accident.生物样本的个体基因识别:以一起飞机事故为例
Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Dec 2;146 Suppl:S115-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.035.
6
Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair flight 111 disaster.大规模死亡事件中用于人类身份识别的强化亲属关系分析和基于短串联重复序列的DNA分型:瑞士航空111号航班灾难
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Sep;49(5):939-53.
7
[A mutation within DYS389I locus in the missing person identification case].[失踪人员身份识别案例中DYS389I基因座内的一个突变]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2007 Jul-Sep;57(3):355-9.
8
A clustering algorithm using DNA marker information for sub-pedigree reconstruction.一种利用DNA标记信息进行亚系谱重建的聚类算法。
J Forensic Sci. 2003 Nov;48(6):1239-48.
9
Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.解读Y染色体短串联重复序列单倍型混合物
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2010 May;12(3):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
10
A special family history.特殊的家族病史。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S512-4. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.100. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferring the Degree of Relatedness and Kinship Types Using an All-in-One Marker Set.使用一体化标记集推断亲缘关系程度和亲属关系类型。
Genes (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;16(4):455. doi: 10.3390/genes16040455.
2
Evaluation of the ForenSeq® Kintelligence Kit and the FORensic Capture Enrichment Panel for Unidentified and Missing Persons Casework.评估ForenSeq® Kintelligence试剂盒和法医捕获富集面板在不明身份和失踪人员案件工作中的应用。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03492-4.
3
Systematically improving the efficiency of complex kinship identification through the addition of genetic markers and reference individuals.
通过添加遗传标记和参考个体来系统地提高复杂亲缘关系鉴定的效率。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03473-7.
4
Y-STR analysis of highly degraded DNA from skeletal remains over 70 years old.对70多年前骨骼残骸中高度降解的DNA进行Y染色体短串联重复序列分析。
Forensic Sci Res. 2024 Apr 12;9(2):owae020. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae020. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Identification of the Remains of an Adult Using DNA from Their Deciduous Teeth as a Reference Sample.利用脱落乳牙 DNA 作为参考样本鉴定成年人遗骸。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 23;59(10):1702. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101702.
6
A machine learning approach for missing persons cases with high genotyping errors.一种用于处理具有高基因分型错误的失踪人员案件的机器学习方法。
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 3;13:971242. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.971242. eCollection 2022.
7
Precision DNA Mixture Interpretation with Single-Cell Profiling.单细胞分析的精准DNA混合物解读
Genes (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;12(11):1649. doi: 10.3390/genes12111649.
8
How many familial relationship testing results could be wrong?有多少亲属关系检测结果可能是错误的?
PLoS Genet. 2020 Aug 13;16(8):e1008929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008929. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Using already-solved cases of a mass disaster event for prioritizing the search among remaining victims: a Bayesian approach.利用已解决的大规模灾难事件案例对剩余受害者进行优先搜索:一种贝叶斯方法。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59841-3.
10
Improved Y-STR typing for disaster victim identification, missing persons investigations, and historical human skeletal remains.用于灾难遇难者身份识别、失踪人员调查及历史时期人类骨骼遗骸的改进型Y染色体短串联重复序列分型技术
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Nov;132(6):1545-1553. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1794-8. Epub 2018 Feb 23.