Promislow Steven, Walker John R, Taheri Mohammed, Bernstein Charles Noah
IBD Clinical and Research Center, Department of Clinical Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;24(11):671-7. doi: 10.1155/2010/957264.
the Internet is an increasingly important source of health information.
to assess how well common websites answered patients' questions regarding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
thirty websites were identified and evaluated. Based on a previous survey of patient information needs, a comprehensive question list was developed in the three following areas: medical information (seven items), medical treatment (six items) and selfmanagement (eight items). The websites were evaluated for the amount of information they provided to answer each question using two standard measures of information quality - the DISCERN and the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients scales.
four particularly strong websites, scoring highest (on a scale from 1 to 5) in terms of IBD information, were the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (mean information score 4.3), About.com (4.2), HealthCentral (3.8) and WebMD (3.8). These websites also scored well on the DISCERN and the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients quality scales. Most websites provided at least adequate information on common symptoms, complications, treatments and what is known (or not known) about the causes of IBD. However, many websites did not provide adequate information about prognosis, possible side effects of treatment and risks of developing cancer. Information regarding self-management was covered to a very limited extent.
websites could be strengthened by providing more of the information patients deem to be important, and by more clearly identifying sources of information and the date the information was updated. Most websites would benefit from more attention given to reducing the reading level and improving the organization of material.
互联网日益成为健康信息的重要来源。
评估常见网站对患者有关炎症性肠病(IBD)问题的回答情况。
识别并评估了30个网站。基于先前对患者信息需求的调查,在以下三个领域制定了一份综合问题清单:医疗信息(7项)、医疗治疗(6项)和自我管理(8项)。使用两种信息质量标准衡量方法——DISCERN和患者质量信息保障量表,对网站提供回答每个问题的信息量进行评估。
四个特别出色的网站,在IBD信息方面得分最高(1至5分制),分别是美国克罗恩病和结肠炎基金会(平均信息得分4.3)、About.com(4.2)、HealthCentral(3.8)和WebMD(3.8)。这些网站在DISCERN和患者质量信息保障质量量表上得分也很高。大多数网站至少提供了关于常见症状、并发症、治疗以及IBD病因已知(或未知)情况的充分信息。然而,许多网站没有提供关于预后、治疗可能的副作用以及患癌风险的充分信息。关于自我管理的信息涉及程度非常有限。
通过提供更多患者认为重要的信息,以及更清晰地标明信息来源和信息更新日期,网站可以得到加强。大多数网站若能更加注重降低阅读难度和改善材料组织,将从中受益。