Suppr超能文献

一线护理员日常实践:传统养老院与“绿房子”项目点的对比研究。

Frontline caregiver daily practices: a comparison study of traditional nursing homes and the Green House project sites.

机构信息

Health Management Strategies, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jan;59(1):126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03209.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe differences in frontline caregiver daily practice in two types of skilled nursing facility (SNF) settings, Green House (GH) homes and traditional SNF units, related to overall staffing (nursing and nonnursing departments), direct care and indirect care time per resident day, and staff time interacting with residents.

DESIGN

Observational, interview, and survey study comparing frontline caregiver daily practice in GH homes and traditional SNFs.

SETTING

Twenty-seven sites (GH homes and traditional SNF units).

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty staff from participating sites.

MEASUREMENTS

Site and resident characteristics, nursing and nonnursing department staff hours per resident day (HPRDs), certified nursing assistant (CNA) direct and indirect care HPRDs, and CNA HPRDs engaged with residents.

RESULTS

Staffing from nursing and nonnursing departments combined, excluding administrative, was 0.3 less HPRDs (18 minutes) in GH homes than in traditional SNFs. CNAs in GH homes, although responsible for more nonnursing activities such as laundry and housekeeping, spent 0.4 more HPRDs (24 minutes) in direct care activities than CNAs in traditional SNFs.

CONCLUSION

The results challenge the assumption that staffing efficiencies cannot be achieved in small environments such as a GH home. Although the GH model has higher ratio of CNA staff to residents than traditional SNF units, overall staff time (combined total of nursing and nonnursing HPRDs) is slightly less in GH homes. The GH model allows for expanded responsibilities of CNAs in indirect care activities and more time in direct care activities and engaging directly with resident.

摘要

目的

描述两种不同类型的熟练护理机构(SNF)环境——绿色住宅(GH)住宅和传统 SNF 单元中,一线护理人员日常实践中的差异,差异涉及整体人员配置(护理和非护理部门)、每位居民每天的直接护理和间接护理时间,以及员工与居民互动的时间。

设计

比较 GH 住宅和传统 SNF 中一线护理人员日常实践的观察、访谈和调查研究。

地点

27 个地点(GH 住宅和传统 SNF 单元)。

参与者

来自参与地点的 240 名员工。

测量

站点和居民特征、护理和非护理部门每位居民每天的员工小时数(HPRD)、注册护士助理(CNA)直接和间接护理 HPRD 以及与居民互动的 CNA HPRD。

结果

护理和非护理部门(不包括行政部门)的员工人数加在一起,GH 住宅比传统 SNF 少 0.3 个 HPRD(18 分钟)。尽管 GH 住宅中的 CNA 负责更多的非护理活动,如洗衣和家政,但他们在直接护理活动中花费的 HPRD 比传统 SNF 中的 CNA 多 0.4 个(24 分钟)。

结论

结果挑战了这样一种假设,即在 GH 住宅等小环境中不可能实现人员配置效率。尽管 GH 模式中 CNA 员工与居民的比例高于传统 SNF 单位,但 GH 住宅的整体员工时间(护理和非护理 HPRD 的总和)略少。GH 模式允许 CNA 在间接护理活动中承担更多责任,并在直接护理活动和与居民直接接触方面投入更多时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验