Paul E Marik, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, United States.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Nov 30;1(1):3-5. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v1.i1.3.
Until recently, stress hyperglycemia was considered to be a beneficial adaptive response, with raised blood glucose providing a ready source of fuel for the brain, skeletal muscle, heart and other vital organs at a time of increased metabolic demand. Following the Leuven Intensive Insulin Therapy Trial in 2001, tight glycemic control became rapidly adopted as the standard of care in intensive care units (ICU's) throughout the world. However, four randomized controlled studies and the recently published NICE-SUGAR study have subsequently been unable to replicate the findings of the Leuven Intensive Insulin Therapy Trial. This paper offers an explanation for these discordant findings, and provides a practical approach to glucose control in the ICU.
直到最近,应激性高血糖仍被认为是一种有益的适应性反应,因为在代谢需求增加时,升高的血糖为大脑、骨骼肌、心脏和其他重要器官提供了现成的燃料来源。2001 年勒芬强化胰岛素治疗试验后,严格血糖控制迅速被采纳为世界各地重症监护病房(ICU)的标准治疗方法。然而,四项随机对照研究和最近发表的 NICE-SUGAR 研究随后未能复制勒芬强化胰岛素治疗试验的发现。本文对这些不一致的发现提供了一个解释,并为 ICU 中的血糖控制提供了一种实用的方法。