Graduate Student, Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Korea University, Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Mar;1(1):31-6. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
To determine the change in stability of single-stage, three different design of implant systems in humans utilizing resonance frequency analysis for early healing period (24 weeks), without loading.
Twenty-five patients were included into this study. A total of 45 implants, three different design of implant systems (group A,C,R) were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The specific transducer for each implant system was used. ISQ (implant stability quotient) reading were obtained for each implant at the time of surgery, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed for different implant type, bone type, healing time, anatomical locations.
For each implant system, a two-factor mixed-model ANOVA demonstrated that a significant effect on ISQ values (group A = 0.0022, C = 0.017, R = 0.0018). For each implant system, in a two-factor mixed model ANOVA, and two-sample t-test, the main effect of jaw position (P > .005) on ISQ values were not significant.
All the implant groups A, C and R, the change patterns of ISQ over time differed by bone type. Implant stability increased greatly between week 0 and week six and showed slow increase between week six and six months (plateau effect).
利用共振频率分析在非负重的早期愈合期(24 周),确定单阶段三种不同设计的种植体系统在人体中的稳定性变化。
本研究纳入了 25 名患者。共植入 45 颗种植体,三种不同设计的种植体系统(A、C、R 组)分别植入上颌后区或下颌后区。每个种植体系统都使用了特定的传感器。在手术时、术后 3、6、8、10、12、24 周时,对每个种植体的 ISQ(种植体稳定性指数)读数进行了测量。对不同的种植体类型、骨类型、愈合时间、解剖位置进行了数据分析。
对于每种种植体系统,两因素混合模型方差分析显示 ISQ 值有显著影响(A 组=0.0022,C 组=0.017,R 组=0.0018)。在两因素混合模型方差分析和两样本 t 检验中,对于每种种植体系统,颌骨位置的主要影响(P>0.005)对 ISQ 值没有显著影响。
在 A、C 和 R 组所有种植体中,ISQ 值随时间的变化模式因骨类型而异。种植体稳定性在 0 到 6 周之间大幅增加,并在 6 到 6 个月之间缓慢增加(平台效应)。