Suppr超能文献

[德国重伤患者的院际转运。德国创伤外科学会(DGU)创伤登记册的评估]

[Interhospital transfer of severely injured patients in Germany. Evaluation of the DGU trauma register].

作者信息

Schneppendahl J, Lefering R, Kühne C A, Ruchholz S, Hakimi M, Witte I, Lögters T, Windolf J, Flohé S

机构信息

Klinik für Unfall- und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2012 Aug;115(8):717-24. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1914-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The TraumaNetzwerk(D) DGU was founded 3 years ago and since then the majority of trauma centers have been registered and organized into regional trauma network services (TNW). Within these networks assessment criteria for transferring patients to higher level hospitals are defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, causes, implications and quality of care for patients with major trauma who were transferred for definitive treatment before implementation of the TraumaNetzwerk(D) DGU in Germany.

PATIENT AND METHODS

The data of 19,035 patients listed in the German Trauma Register of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU, 2002-2007) were analyzed. Patients with an injury severity score (ISS) >9 and a blood pressure documented on admission were included into the study. Data were allocated according to patients where therapy was performed completely in the primary hospital of admission (group I; n=16,033; 84.2%) and patients transferred after primary care from one hospital to another centre for definitive care (group II; n=3,002; 15.8%). Comparative parameters were the pattern and severity of injury, physiological state on admission and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Mean ISS and percentage of patients with an ISS ≥25 did not differ significantly between groups. Of the patients who were transferred to a higher level trauma centre (group II) 20.7% needed catecholamines on admission, 10.1% were in shock (blood pressure <90 mmHg) and 2.5% of the patients underwent resuscitation in the emergency department. Patients of group II had a considerably longer hospital stay (31.2±35.5 days) than patients of group I (24.8±27.1 days). Furthermore, treatment costs were significantly higher for group II (I: EUR 23,870; II: EUR 26,054).

CONCLUSIONS

A relevant percentage of patients transferred from one hospital to another were hemodynamically and clinically unstable. To what extent the quality of patient transfer and therefore major trauma care is improved by the implementation of regional trauma networks in Germany remains to be seen over the next years.

摘要

背景

德国创伤网络(DGU)于3年前成立,自那时起,大多数创伤中心已登记并组建为区域创伤网络服务(TNW)。在这些网络中,定义了将患者转至更高水平医院的评估标准。本研究的目的是评估在德国实施德国创伤网络(DGU)之前因确定性治疗而被转院的严重创伤患者的发生率、病因、影响及护理质量。

患者与方法

分析了德国创伤外科学会德国创伤登记处(DGU,2002 - 2007年)登记的19,035例患者的数据。纳入研究的患者为损伤严重度评分(ISS)>9且入院时有血压记录者。数据根据患者进行分配,其中在入院的初级医院完成全部治疗的患者(I组;n = 16,033;84.2%)以及在初级护理后从一家医院转至另一家中心接受确定性治疗的患者(II组;n = 3,002;15.8%)。比较参数为损伤类型和严重程度、入院时的生理状态及临床结局。

结果

两组间的平均ISS及ISS≥25的患者百分比无显著差异。转至更高水平创伤中心的患者(II组)中,20.7%入院时需要使用儿茶酚胺,10.1%处于休克状态(血压<90 mmHg),2.5%的患者在急诊科接受了复苏。II组患者的住院时间(31.2±35.5天)明显长于I组患者(24.8±27.1天)。此外,II组的治疗费用显著更高(I组:23,870欧元;II组:26,054欧元)。

结论

从一家医院转至另一家医院的患者中有相当比例在血流动力学和临床上不稳定。德国通过实施区域创伤网络在多大程度上改善了患者转运质量以及因此改善了严重创伤护理,在未来几年仍有待观察。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验