• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从战前到战后创伤后应激障碍症状动态网络结构的变化。

Changes in the dynamic network structure of PTSD symptoms pre-to-post combat.

作者信息

Segal Adva, Wald Ilan, Lubin Gad, Fruchter Eyal, Ginat Keren, Ben Yehuda Ariel, Pine Daniel S, Bar-Haim Yair

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Division of Mental Health, Medical Corps, Israel Defense Forces, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2020 Apr;50(5):746-753. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000539. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291719000539
PMID:30919787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7690054/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combat exposure is associated with elevated risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite considerable research on PTSD symptom clustering, it remains unknown how symptoms of PTSD re-organize following combat. Network analysis provides a powerful tool to examine such changes.

METHODS

A network analysis approach was taken to examine how symptom networks change from pre- to post-combat using longitudinal prospective data from a cohort of infantry male soldiers (Mage = 18.8 years). PTSD symptoms measured using the PTSD Checklist (PCL) were assessed after 6 months of combat training but before deployment and again after 6 months of combat (Ns = 910 and 725 at pre-deployment and post-combat, respectively).

RESULTS

Stronger connectivity between PTSD symptoms was observed post-combat relative to pre-deployment (global strength values of the networks were 7.54 pre v. 7.92 post; S = .38, p < 0.05). Both the re-experiencing symptoms cluster (1.92 v. 2.12; S = .20, p < 0.03) and the avoidance symptoms cluster (2.61 v. 2.96; S = .35, p < 0.005) became more strongly inter-correlated post-combat. Centrality estimation analyses revealed that psychological reaction to triggers was central and linked the intrusion and avoidance sub-clusters at post-combat. The strength of associations between the arousal and reactivity symptoms cluster remained stable over time (1.85 v. 1.83; S = .02, p = .92).

CONCLUSIONS

Following combat, PTSD symptoms and particularly the re-experiencing and avoidance clusters become more strongly inter-correlated, indicating high centrality of trigger-reactivity symptoms.

摘要

背景

经历战斗与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)风险升高有关。尽管对PTSD症状聚类进行了大量研究,但战斗后PTSD症状如何重新组织仍不清楚。网络分析提供了一个强大的工具来研究此类变化。

方法

采用网络分析方法,利用一组步兵男性士兵(平均年龄 = 18.8岁)的纵向前瞻性数据,研究从战前到战后症状网络如何变化。使用PTSD检查表(PCL)测量的PTSD症状在战斗训练6个月后但部署前进行评估,并在战斗6个月后再次评估(战前和战后分别有910人和725人)。

结果

与部署前相比,战斗后观察到PTSD症状之间的连接更强(网络的全局强度值战前为7.54,战后为7.92;S = 0.38,p < 0.05)。重新体验症状聚类(1.92对2.12;S = 0.20,p < 0.03)和回避症状聚类(2.61对2.96;S = 0.35,p < 0.005)在战斗后相互关联更强。中心性估计分析表明,对触发因素的心理反应是核心,并在战斗后连接侵入和回避子聚类。唤醒和反应性症状聚类之间关联的强度随时间保持稳定(1.85对1.83;S = 0.02,p = 0.92)。

结论

战斗后,PTSD症状,尤其是重新体验和回避聚类相互关联更强,表明触发 - 反应性症状具有高度核心地位。

相似文献

1
Changes in the dynamic network structure of PTSD symptoms pre-to-post combat.从战前到战后创伤后应激障碍症状动态网络结构的变化。
Psychol Med. 2020 Apr;50(5):746-753. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000539. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
2
Combat Experiences and their Relationship to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters in UK Military Personnel Deployed to Afghanistan.英国驻阿富汗军事人员的战斗经历及其与创伤后应激障碍症状群的关系
Behav Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;44(2):131-140. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2017.1288606. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Combat Exposure and Risk of Suicide Attempt Among Danish Army Military Personnel.丹麦军队人员的战斗暴露与自杀未遂风险
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 12;82(6):20m13251. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13251.
4
Low neuroticism as an indicator of resilience: a longitudinal study of Danish soldiers before, during and after deployment.低神经质作为复原力的一个指标:对丹麦士兵部署前、部署期间和部署后的纵向研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2476810. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2476810. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
5
The effects of intelligence on exposure to combat and posttraumatic stress disorder across multiple deployments.多次部署期间智力对接触战斗及创伤后应激障碍的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Jan;109:102961. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102961. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
6
Longitudinal changes of telomere length and epigenetic age related to traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder.与创伤应激和创伤后应激障碍相关的端粒长度和表观遗传年龄的纵向变化。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jan;51:506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
7
Attention to threats and combat-related posttraumatic stress symptoms: prospective associations and moderation by the serotonin transporter gene.注意威胁和与战斗相关的创伤后应激症状:前瞻性关联和 5-羟色胺转运体基因的调节。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;70(4):401-8. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.188.
8
Association of time since deployment, combat intensity, and posttraumatic stress symptoms with neuropsychological outcomes following Iraq war deployment.伊拉克战争部署后,部署时长、战斗强度和创伤后应激症状与神经心理学结果的关联。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;66(9):996-1004. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.109.
9
Heart rate variability: Pre-deployment predictor of post-deployment PTSD symptoms.心率变异性:部署后创伤后应激障碍症状的部署前预测指标。
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt A):91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Posttraumatic stress symptoms across the deployment cycle: A latent transition analysis.部署周期中的创伤后应激症状:潜在转变分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying behavior regulatory leverage over mental disorders transcriptomic network hubs toward lifestyle-dependent psychiatric drugs repurposing.识别针对精神障碍转录组网络枢纽的行为调节杠杆作用,以实现依赖生活方式的精神科药物重新利用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Mar 19;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00733-w.
2
Bridging Perspectives: Exploring the Convergence of Clinimetrics and Network Theory in Mental Health Assessment and Conceptualization.衔接观点:探索临床测量学与网络理论在心理健康评估与概念化中的融合
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 21;13(6):1814. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061814.
3
Time course of attentional bias and its relationship with PTSD symptoms in bereaved Chinese parents who have lost their only child.丧子父母创伤后应激障碍症状与注意偏向的时间进程及其关系。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2235980. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2235980.
4
Changes and Influencing Factors of Stress Disorder in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Stress Disorder.轻度创伤性脑损伤后应激障碍患者应激障碍的变化及影响因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 26;2022:9082946. doi: 10.1155/2022/9082946. eCollection 2022.
5
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters in Surrogate Decision Makers of Patients Experiencing Chronic Critical Illness.慢性危重病患者替代决策者的创伤后应激障碍症状群
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 1;4(3):e0647. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000647. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Using language in social media posts to study the network dynamics of depression longitudinally.使用社交媒体帖子中的语言来纵向研究抑郁症的网络动态。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 15;13(1):870. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28513-3.
7
The longitudinal course of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in war survivors: Insights from cross-lagged panel network analyses.战争幸存者创伤后应激障碍症状的纵向过程:交叉滞后面板网络分析的见解。
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Jun;35(3):879-890. doi: 10.1002/jts.22795. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
8
The effect of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of either imagery rescripting or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for adults with PTSD from childhood trauma (IREM-Freq): a study protocol for an international randomized clinical trial.每周两次与每周一次的意象重述或眼动脱敏再处理对童年创伤后应激障碍成年人的影响(IREM-Freq):一项国际随机临床试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Nov 27;22(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05712-9.
9
Perception during use of force and the likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person.使用武力过程中的认知以及向手无寸铁之人开枪的可能性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 25;11(1):13313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90918-9.
10
Network analysis of PTSD in college students across different areas after the COVID-19 epidemic.新冠疫情后不同地区大学生创伤后应激障碍的网络分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 May 26;12(1):1920203. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1920203.

本文引用的文献

1
Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults.1973 年青年人际反应指数中同理心项目的网络分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jul;265:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.082. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
Longitudinal network structure of depression symptoms and self-efficacy in low-income mothers.低收入母亲抑郁症状与自我效能感的纵向网络结构
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 23;13(1):e0191675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191675. eCollection 2018.
3
Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in a clinical sample of refugees: a network analysis.难民临床样本中创伤后应激障碍的症状:一项网络分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 May 16;8(sup3):1318032. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1318032. eCollection 2017.
4
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.估计心理网络及其准确性:教程论文。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
5
Acute and Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Emergence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Network Analysis.创伤后应激障碍出现的急性和慢性创伤后应激症状:网络分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):135-142. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3470.
6
A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and correlates in U.S. military veterans.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状与美国退伍军人相关因素的网络分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Jan;45:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
7
Changes to the Definition of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the DSM-5-Reply.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中创伤后应激障碍定义的变更——回应
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;73(11):1202-1203. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2381.
8
Changes to the Definition of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中创伤后应激障碍定义的变化。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;73(11):1201-1202. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1671.
9
Changes to the Definition of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the DSM-5-Reply.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中创伤后应激障碍定义的变更——回应
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;73(11):1203. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2401.
10
A Complex Network Perspective on Clinical Science.临床科学的复杂网络视角
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):597-605. doi: 10.1177/1745691616639283.