• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥本哈根心理社会问卷第二版。

The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):8-24. doi: 10.1177/1403494809349858.

DOI:10.1177/1403494809349858
PMID:21172767
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of the present paper is to present the development of the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II).

METHODS

The development of COPSOQ II took place in five main steps: (1) We considered practical experience from the use of COPSOQ I, in particular feedback from workplace studies where the questionnaire had been used; (2) All scales concerning workplace factors in COPSOQ I were analyzed for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to gender, age and occupational status; (3) A test version of COPSOQ II including new scales and items was developed and tested in a representative sample of working Danes between 20 and 59 years of age. In all, 3,517 Danish employees participated in the study. The overall response rate was 60.4%; (4) Based on psychometric analyses, the final questionnaire was developed; and (5) Criteria-related validity of the new scales was tested.

RESULTS

The development of COPSOQ II resulted in a questionnaire with 41 scales and 127 items. New scales on values at the workplace were introduced including scales on Trust, Justice and Social inclusiveness. Scales on Variation, Work pace, Recognition, Work-family conflicts and items on offensive behaviour were also added. New scales regarding health symptoms included: Burnout, Stress, Sleeping troubles and Depressive symptoms. In general, the new scales showed good criteria validity. All in all, 57% of the items of COPSOQ I were retained in COPSOQ II.

CONCLUSIONS

The COPSOQ I concept has been further developed and new validated scales have been included.

摘要

目的

本文旨在介绍哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ II)第二版的发展。

方法

COPSOQ II 的开发分五个主要步骤进行:(1)我们考虑了 COPSOQ I 的实际使用经验,特别是从使用该问卷的工作场所研究中获得的反馈;(2)对 COPSOQ I 中所有与工作场所因素相关的量表进行了性别、年龄和职业地位方面的差异项目功能(DIF)分析;(3)开发了 COPSOQ II 的测试版本,包括新的量表和项目,并在 20 至 59 岁的丹麦工作人群中进行了代表性测试。共有 3517 名丹麦员工参与了这项研究。总体回复率为 60.4%;(4)基于心理测量学分析,开发了最终问卷;(5)测试了新量表的相关有效性。

结果

COPSOQ II 的开发产生了一个包含 41 个量表和 127 个项目的问卷。引入了新的工作场所价值观量表,包括信任、公正和社会包容性量表。还增加了关于变化、工作节奏、认可、工作与家庭冲突以及冒犯行为的量表。关于健康症状的新量表包括:倦怠、压力、睡眠问题和抑郁症状。总的来说,新量表具有较好的标准有效性。总的来说,COPSOQ I 的 57%的项目在 COPSOQ II 中得以保留。

结论

COPSOQ I 的概念得到了进一步发展,并纳入了新的经过验证的量表。

相似文献

1
The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会问卷第二版。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):8-24. doi: 10.1177/1403494809349858.
2
Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会问卷的信度。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):25-32. doi: 10.1177/1403494809349859.
3
Do psychosocial work environment factors measured with scales from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict register-based sickness absence of 3 weeks or more in Denmark?使用哥本哈根心理社会问卷量表测量的心理社会工作环境因素是否可以预测丹麦登记在册的 3 周及以上病假?
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):42-50. doi: 10.1177/1403494809346873.
4
Determining minimally important score differences in scales of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.确定哥本哈根心理社会问卷量表中最小重要得分差异。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):33-41. doi: 10.1177/1403494809347024.
5
The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain--a tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace.西班牙的哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷II(COPSOQ II)——一种工作场所心理社会风险评估工具。
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Jan;57(1):97-107. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22238. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
6
The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire in Germany: from the validation of the instrument to the formation of a job-specific database of psychosocial factors at work.哥本哈根心理社会问卷在德国:从工具的验证到工作相关心理社会因素的特定工作数据库的形成。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):120-4. doi: 10.1177/1403494809353652.
7
Evaluating construct validity of the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire through analysis of differential item functioning and differential item effect.通过分析项目间功能差异和项目间效应评估哥本哈根心理社会问卷第二版的结构效度。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):90-105. doi: 10.1177/1403494809352533.
8
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Job Stress Survey.瑞典版工作压力调查问卷的评估
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Jun;49(3):277-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00639.x. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
9
Psychosocial work environment of hospital workers: validation of a comprehensive assessment scale.医院工作人员的社会心理工作环境:一种综合评估量表的验证
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):814-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
10
The effect of the work environment and performance-based self-esteem on cognitive stress symptoms among Danish knowledge workers.工作环境和基于绩效的自尊对丹麦知识工作者认知压力症状的影响。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):81-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494809352104.

引用本文的文献

1
A Validation Study of the COPSOQ III Greek Questionnaire for Assessing Psychosocial Factors in the Workplace.用于评估工作场所心理社会因素的COPSOQ III希腊语问卷的验证研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;13(16):1980. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161980.
2
Critical analysis of psychosocial factors at work within the Risk Management Program of Regulatory Standard-1.对监管标准1风险管理计划中工作场所社会心理因素的批判性分析。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2025 Aug 25;23(1):e20251425. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1425. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
3
Burnout related factors of infection control nurses in long-term care hospitals.
长期护理医院中感染控制护士的职业倦怠相关因素
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2025 Oct;22(4):e70019. doi: 10.1111/jjns.70019.
4
Spirulina-fortified salad dressing on body composition and anthropometric indices in hypertensive patients: A tipple-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.螺旋藻强化沙拉酱对高血压患者身体成分和人体测量指标的影响:一项三盲随机安慰剂对照试验。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2025 Jun 23;16(3):553-561. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.3.553. eCollection 2025 Summer.
5
Intra-Rater Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold with Different Algometers in Healthy Participants.健康受试者中使用不同压力痛觉计测量压力疼痛阈值的评分者内信度
Muscles. 2025 Feb 11;4(1):5. doi: 10.3390/muscles4010005.
6
Work Environment and Work Context Factors Associated With Homecare Workers' Intention to Leave: An Analysis of a National, Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.与家庭护理人员离职意愿相关的工作环境和工作背景因素:一项全国性多中心横断面研究的分析
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 9;2025:1554741. doi: 10.1155/jonm/1554741. eCollection 2025.
7
Sleep, health conditions and quality of life among professors at higher education institutions in Brazil: baseline data from the RESPIRA cohort.巴西高等教育机构教授的睡眠、健康状况与生活质量:来自RESPIRA队列的基线数据
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23465-x.
8
Effects of psychosocial factors on Swedish waste collectors musculoskeletal pain through the mediating roles of occupational fatigue and physical demands: a structural equation model.心理社会因素通过职业疲劳和身体需求的中介作用对瑞典垃圾收集者肌肉骨骼疼痛的影响:一个结构方程模型
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22903-0.
9
Psychosocial Risks in Spanish Nursing: Relationship With Stability and Working Conditions.西班牙护理工作中的社会心理风险:与稳定性和工作条件的关系
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 20;70:1608330. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608330. eCollection 2025.
10
Mental health at work: a practical framework for employers.工作场所的心理健康:雇主实用框架
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1552981. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1552981. eCollection 2025.