Suppr超能文献

2%甲哌卡因与1:20000左诺孕酮肾上腺素对比2%利多卡因与1:100000肾上腺素用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较

A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.

作者信息

Lawaty Ingrid, Drum Melissa, Reader Al, Nusstein John

机构信息

Private Practice in Endodontics, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 2010 Winter;57(4):139-44. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.4.139.

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine in maxillary central incisors and first molars. Sixty subjects randomly received, in a double-blind manner, maxillary central incisor and first molar infiltrations of 1.8 mL of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin and 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine at 2 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. The teeth were electric pulp tested in 2-minute cycles for a total of 60 minutes. Anesthetic success (obtaining 2 consecutive 80 readings with the electric pulp tester within 10 minutes) was not significantly different between 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin and 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for the central incisor and first molar. However, neither anesthetic agent provided an hour of pulpal anesthesia.

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机、双盲交叉研究的目的是比较2%甲哌卡因与1∶20000左旋去甲肾上腺素组合和2%利多卡因与1∶100000肾上腺素组合在上颌中切牙和第一磨牙的麻醉效果。60名受试者以双盲方式,在两次至少间隔1周的单独就诊中,分别接受上颌中切牙和第一磨牙的浸润麻醉,一次注射1.8 mL含1∶20000左旋去甲肾上腺素的2%甲哌卡因,另一次注射1.8 mL含1∶100000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因。用牙髓电活力测试仪以2分钟为一个周期对牙齿进行测试,共测试60分钟。对于中切牙和第一磨牙,含1∶20000左旋去甲肾上腺素的2%甲哌卡因与含1∶100000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因在麻醉成功率(在10分钟内用牙髓电活力测试仪连续两次读数达到80)方面无显著差异。然而,两种麻醉剂均未提供1小时的牙髓麻醉。

相似文献

6
Anesthetic efficacy of the palatal-anterior superior alveolar injection.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Sep;135(9):1269-76. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0402.
7
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

2
Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jul 21;46(3):e41. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e41. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Impact of maxillary teeth morphology on the failure rate of local anesthesia.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):57-62. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_542_19. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
4
Efficacy of dental local anesthetics: A review.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Dec;18(6):319-332. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.6.319. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
5
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7(7):CD006487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2.
8
Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations.
Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):90-101; quiz 102-3. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90.

本文引用的文献

2
The efficacy of a repeated infiltration in prolonging duration of pulpal anesthesia in maxillary lateral incisors.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Mar;140(3):318-24. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0161.
3
Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
Anesth Prog. 2008 Summer;55(2):29-34. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[29:AEOVOL]2.0.CO;2.
4
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
9
MINIMUM DOSAGE TECHNIQUE IN THE CLINICAL COMPARISON OF REPRESENTATIVE MODERN LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENTS.
J Dent Res. 1964 Nov-Dec;43:1228-49. doi: 10.1177/00220345640430063401.
10
Clinical evaluation of mepivacaine hydrochloride by a new method.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1961 Jul;63:26-32. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1961.0161.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验