University of Pennsylvania.
Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(4):749-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00356.x.
Compared to other developed countries, the United States ranks poorly in terms of life expectancy at age 50. We seek to shed light on the US's low life expectancy ranking by comparing the age-specific death rates of 18 developed countries at older ages. A striking pattern emerges: between ages 40 and 75, US all-cause mortality rates are among the poorest in the set of comparison countries. The US position improves dramatically after age 75 for both males and females. We consider four possible explanations of the age patterns revealed by this analysis: (1) access to health insurance; (2) international differences in patterns of smoking; (3) age patterns of health care system performance; and (4) selection processes. We find that health insurance and smoking are not plausible sources of this age pattern. While we cannot rule out selection, we present suggestive evidence that an unusually vigorous deployment of life-saving technologies by the US health care system at very old ages is contributing to the age-pattern of US mortality rankings. Differences in obesity distributions are likely to be making a moderate contribution to the pattern but uncertainty about the risks associated with obesity prevents a precise assessment.
与其他发达国家相比,美国在 50 岁时的预期寿命排名较低。我们通过比较 18 个发达国家的特定年龄死亡率,旨在揭示美国低预期寿命排名的原因。一个显著的模式出现了:在 40 岁至 75 岁之间,美国所有原因的死亡率在比较国家中属于最差的。对于男性和女性来说,75 岁以后,美国的地位都有了显著的提高。我们考虑了这种分析所揭示的年龄模式的四个可能解释:(1)获得医疗保险;(2)吸烟模式的国际差异;(3)医疗保健系统绩效的年龄模式;(4)选择过程。我们发现,医疗保险和吸烟不是造成这种年龄模式的合理原因。虽然我们不能排除选择的可能性,但我们提供了一些暗示性的证据,表明美国医疗保健系统在非常高龄时非常积极地部署挽救生命的技术,这对美国死亡率排名的年龄模式有贡献。肥胖分布的差异可能对这一模式有一定的影响,但由于肥胖相关风险的不确定性,无法对其进行准确评估。