• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种联合制作的方法,使服务使用者参与研究:SUCCESS 模型。

A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model.

机构信息

Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.

Centre for Innovative Ageing, College of Human and Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6
PMID:30770732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6377726/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public and patient involvement is a routine element of health services research methods to produce better designed and reported studies. Although co-production is recommended when involving people in research, methods for involving people are usually designed and managed by researchers and there is little evidence about methods to co-produce models for effective public and patient involvement. We report the method used by a group of patient and carer service users to develop and implement a model for involving public members in research.

METHOD

We recruited people with experience of chronic conditions, as patients and carers, and supported them to develop and implement the involvement model. We collected written records to describe the processes of co-production.

RESULTS

Sixteen service users were involved through a series of workshop, meeting and email discussions. They specified principles and operating characteristics of the model which concerned an inclusive culture, adequate resources, accessibility, good communication and clarity of purpose and roles. Components of the model included an on-line Panel of members (n = 20), Steering Group meetings, representation and communication system, facilitator, supportive research environment and access to research activities. Over 8 years, members were active in 218 research activities and held 22 Steering Group meetings. The model was named SUCCESS standing for Service Users with Chronic Conditions Encouraging Sensible Solutions.

CONCLUSION

We supported patients and carers to co-produce the SUCCESS model of involvement in research. The model's components, addressing their needs and priorities, led to sustained involvement in research over 8 years. Further work is needed to apply the model in different settings and assess impact of this method of involving people in research.

摘要

背景

公众和患者参与是卫生服务研究方法的常规要素,旨在产生设计和报告更好的研究。尽管在涉及人员参与研究时推荐共同生产,但参与人员的方法通常由研究人员设计和管理,并且几乎没有关于共同生产有效公众和患者参与模型的方法的证据。我们报告了一组患者和护理服务使用者用于开发和实施参与公众成员研究模型的方法。

方法

我们招募了有慢性疾病经验的人,作为患者和护理人员,并支持他们开发和实施参与模型。我们收集书面记录来描述共同生产的过程。

结果

通过一系列研讨会、会议和电子邮件讨论,有 16 名服务使用者参与其中。他们指定了模型的原则和操作特点,这些特点涉及包容文化、充足资源、可及性、良好沟通和明确的目的和角色。该模型的组成部分包括在线成员小组(n=20)、指导小组会议、代表和沟通系统、促进者、支持性研究环境以及参与研究活动的机会。8 年来,成员积极参与了 218 项研究活动,并举行了 22 次指导小组会议。该模型被命名为 SUCCESS,代表慢性疾病患者鼓励明智解决方案的服务使用者。

结论

我们支持患者和护理人员共同生产参与研究的 SUCCESS 模型。该模型的组成部分满足了他们的需求和优先事项,导致在 8 年多的时间里持续参与研究。需要进一步的工作来将该模型应用于不同的环境,并评估这种参与人员参与研究的方法的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eac0/6377726/3e9ca161f43e/12874_2019_671_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eac0/6377726/3e9ca161f43e/12874_2019_671_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eac0/6377726/3e9ca161f43e/12874_2019_671_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model.一种联合制作的方法,使服务使用者参与研究:SUCCESS 模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6.
2
Lone voices have an emotional content: focussing on mental health service user and carer involvement.个人观点带有情感内容:关注精神卫生服务使用者及照料者的参与情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):164-77. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105112.
3
Developing a training package.开发一个培训包。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Jun 12;30(5):458-466. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2016-0084.
4
Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure.将服务使用者纳入试验中:制定标准操作规程。
Trials. 2013 Jul 17;14:219. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-219.
5
Involving older people in a multi-centre randomised trial of a complex intervention in pre-hospital emergency care: implementation of a collaborative model.让老年人参与一项针对院前急救复杂干预措施的多中心随机试验:协作模式的实施
Trials. 2015 Jul 10;16:298. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0821-z.
6
The legal, governance and ethical implications of involving service users and carers in research.让服务使用者和护理者参与研究的法律、治理及伦理问题
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Jun 10;32(5):818-831. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2017-0131.
7
Involving Members of the Public in Health Economics Research: Insights from Selecting Health States for Valuation to Estimate Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) Weights.让公众参与健康经济学研究:从选择健康状态进行估值以估算质量调整生命年 (QALY) 权重中获得的见解。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Apr;16(2):187-194. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0355-5.
8
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.患者和公众参与对服务使用者、研究人员和社区影响的系统评价。
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0.
9
A potential model for the first all Wales mental health service user and carer-led research group.一个潜在的全威尔士心理健康服务使用者和照顾者主导的研究小组的模型。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Feb;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01473.x.
10
A stronger voice.一个更强有力的声音。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(2):211-22. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2014-0101.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting consumer engagement in health research about chronic conditions: a scoping review of evidence-based resources.支持消费者参与慢性病健康研究:基于证据的资源的范围审查
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 29;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00707-1.
2
Take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency settings: the TIME feasibility cluster RCT.带离型纳洛酮在多中心急救环境中的应用:TIME 可行性集群 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(74):1-69. doi: 10.3310/YNRC8249.
3
Recruitment of patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups and panels in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects and costs of implementing predictive risk stratification in primary care: a randomised stepped wedge trial.实施初级保健预测风险分层的效果和成本:一项随机阶梯式楔形试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):697-705. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007976. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
2
Involving seldom-heard groups in a PPI process to inform the design of a proposed trial on the use of probiotics to prevent preterm birth: a case study.让很少被听到声音的群体参与患者和公众参与(PPI)过程,以为一项关于使用益生菌预防早产的拟议试验的设计提供信息:一项案例研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 May 25;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0061-3. eCollection 2017.
3
Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.
招募患者、护理人员和公众成员加入公共和患者参与的健康研究中的咨询委员会、小组和专题小组:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 13;13(10):e072918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072918.
4
Protocol for the mixed methods, Managing young people (aged 16-25) with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Primary care (MAP) study: mapping current practice and co-producing guidance to improve healthcare in an underserved population.混合方法研究方案:在初级保健中管理患有注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的年轻人(16-25 岁)(MAP)研究:绘制当前实践图并共同制定指导意见,以改善服务不足人群的医疗保健。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 10;13(7):e068184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068184.
5
Scoping review of models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research.患者参与卫生服务研究模型和框架的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):e063507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063507.
6
A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.一项范围综述,旨在识别和描述健康研究伙伴关系的理论、模型和框架的特征。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 18;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00877-4.
7
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.英国资助的应用健康研究中的共同生产实践和未来研究重点:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00838-x.
8
Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.生成创新研究思路的方法和提高现代流行病学研究中患者和公众参与度的方法:综述、患者观点以及实施数字队列研究的指南。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e25743. doi: 10.2196/25743.
9
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
10
Public involvement and engagement in primary and emergency care research: the story from PRIME Centre Wales.公众参与和参与初级及急救护理研究:威尔士PRIME中心的故事。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Sep 30;5(3):1363. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1363.
与东米德兰兹地区的公众和研究组织成员共同开展公众参与培训:创建、实施和评估外行人评估员培训计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 5;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0056-0. eCollection 2017.
4
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
5
A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress.一个用于有意义且灵活参与临床试验的患者和公众参与(PPI)工具包——正在进行中的工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.
6
Going the extra mile - creating a co-operative model for supporting patient and public involvement in research.更进一步——创建一个支持患者和公众参与研究的合作模式。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 4;2:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0025-z. eCollection 2016.
7
Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability.患者及公众参与初级医疗研究——确保其可持续性的一个实例
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jan 14;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1. eCollection 2016.
8
Engaging patients with heart failure into the design of health system interventions: Impact on research methods.让心力衰竭患者参与卫生系统干预措施的设计:对研究方法的影响。
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Jul-Aug;38(4):342-346. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare.实施的集体行动:对医疗保健领域组织协作的现实主义评估
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 9;11:17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0380-z.
10
Sustaining patient and public involvement in research: A case study of a research centre.维持患者和公众对研究的参与:一个研究中心的案例研究
J Care Serv Manag. 2013 Dec;7(4):146-154. doi: 10.1179/1750168715Y.0000000003.