相似文献
1
Presenting and evaluating qualitative research.呈现和评估定性研究。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Oct 11;74(8):141. doi: 10.5688/aj7408141.
2
Guidance for Qualitative Research Manuscripts in Pharmacy Education.药学教育中定性研究手稿的指导
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jul;87(7):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100089. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
A Peek Behind the Scenes of the .幕后一瞥……（原文不完整，此为按现有内容翻译）
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7877. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7877.
4
Insights, Pearls, and Guidance on Successfully Producing and Publishing Educational Research.关于成功开展和发表教育研究的见解、要点及指南。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Jun 25;80(5):75. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80575.
5
Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers.构建评估定性研究论文的标准：同行评审员的工具
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019 Mar 28;53:e03448. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2018041403448.
6
Authorship Considerations for Publishing in Pharmacy Education Journals.出版于药学教育期刊的注意事项。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):7463. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7463.
7
Doing qualitative research in dentistry and dental education.在牙科和牙医学教育中进行定性研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2012 May;16(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00734.x. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
8
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement.《行为干预单病例报告指南（SCRIBE）2016声明》
Can J Occup Ther. 2016 Jun;83(3):184-95. doi: 10.1177/0008417416648124.
9
[Economic evaluation studies in health].[卫生领域的经济评估研究]
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:61-71. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(05)72212-0.
10
Trends in the Number of Authors and Institutions in Papers Published in AJPE 2015-2019.2015-2019 年 AJPE 发表论文的作者和机构数量趋势。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Mar;87(2):ajpe8972. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8972. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
引用本文的文献
1
Content Validity of the Spinocerebellar Ataxia Composite Score as a Measure of Disease Progression in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia.脊髓小脑共济失调综合评分作为脊髓小脑共济失调患者疾病进展指标的内容效度
Cerebellum. 2025 Sep 1;24(5):146. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01896-x.
2
Community perceptions of citizen science approach in pandemic preparedness and response in South and Southeast Asian countries.南亚和东南亚国家社区对公民科学方法在大流行防范与应对中的看法。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 21;5(8):e0003696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003696. eCollection 2025.
3
Voices of Students in Crisis: Qualitative Interviews with College Students Hospitalized for Psychiatric Distress.处于危机中的学生心声：对因精神困扰住院的大学生进行的定性访谈
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10199-7.
4
Experience of clinical incivility and stress in nursing students: A mixed-method study.护理专业学生临床不文明行为与压力的体验：一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0329333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329333. eCollection 2025.
5
Perspectives of family medicine residents on artificial intelligence for survival estimation in patients with serious illness.家庭医学住院医师对人工智能用于危重病患者生存预估的看法。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 1;4(7):e0000917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000917. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Acceptability of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in bipolar depression: thematic analysis of individual views.家庭式经颅直流电刺激（tDCS）在双相抑郁症中的可接受性：个人观点的主题分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 26;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06948-4.
7
How can community pharmacy teams prevent prescription and over-the-counter opioid misuse in North East England? A qualitative study using the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model.在英格兰东北部，社区药房团队如何预防处方和非处方类阿片类药物的滥用？一项运用能力、机会和动机行为（COM-B）模型的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 12;15(5):e099801. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099801.
8
Acceptability of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Bipolar Depression: Thematic Analysis of Individual Views.家庭式经颅直流电刺激（tDCS）在双相抑郁中的可接受性：个体观点的主题分析
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 15:rs.3.rs-5967699. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5967699/v1.
9
The Childbirth Experience Survey (CBEX): An Analysis of Qualitative Survey data.分娩体验调查（CBEX）：定性调查数据分析
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Apr;29(4):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04043-4. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Barriers and Enablers for Accessing Rehabilitation Services: Findings From the Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 1-Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives.获得康复服务的障碍与促进因素：康复选择研究的结果，第1部分——医疗保健专业人员的观点
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14120. doi: 10.1111/hex.14120.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment to transform competency-based curricula.基于能力的课程转化评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):158. doi: 10.5688/aj7308158.
2
Making sense of qualitative research: a new series.理解定性研究：一个新系列。
Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):5-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02024.x.
3
The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes.《卡尔加里-剑桥参考观察指南》：界定课程及组织沟通培训项目教学的辅助工具。
Med Educ. 1996 Mar;30(2):83-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00724.x.
Zotero 插件