Suppr超能文献

基于能力的课程转化评估。

Assessment to transform competency-based curricula.

机构信息

University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, IA 52242-1112, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):158. doi: 10.5688/aj7308158.

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to apply Kotter's 8 steps to transforming organizations as a framework for the role of assessment in competency-based curricular reform. Two analyses were conducted including (1) environmental scan of literature about assessment in curricular reform and (2) qualitative analyses of data from a college of pharmacy which instituted curricular reform. These assessment-focused data sources were interpreted in view of Kotter's 8 steps. Creating a sense of urgency, forming a powerful guiding coalition, creating a vision and creating short-term wins were the 4 steps most evident in the literature. In the case study, creating a sense of urgency, forming a powerful guiding coalition, creating short-term wins, consolidating improvements, and producing additional change were most important. The case study also indicated that (a) the history or climate of the institution in dealing with change, and (b) involving individuals with specific expertise as part of the leadership group were also important. Recommendations (PREPARE) were developed. Assessment is an enabling and valuable element in each stage of curricular transformation when guided by Kotter's model.

摘要

本文旨在将 Kotter 的 8 个步骤应用于组织变革,作为评估在基于能力的课程改革中的作用的框架。进行了两项分析,包括(1)对课程改革中评估文献的环境扫描,以及(2)对一所药学院实施课程改革的数据进行的定性分析。这些以评估为重点的数据源是根据 Kotter 的 8 个步骤进行解释的。在文献中,最明显的是前 4 个步骤:创造紧迫感、形成强大的指导联盟、创造愿景和创造短期胜利。在案例研究中,创造紧迫感、形成强大的指导联盟、创造短期胜利、巩固改进和产生额外的变革是最重要的。案例研究还表明,(a)机构在处理变革方面的历史或氛围,以及(b)让具有特定专业知识的个人作为领导团队的一部分,也很重要。(准备)提出了建议。在 Kotter 模型的指导下,评估是课程转型各个阶段的一个使能和有价值的因素。

相似文献

1
Assessment to transform competency-based curricula.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):158. doi: 10.5688/aj7308158.
2
Mento's change model in teaching competency-based medical education.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1896-0.
3
Addressing competencies for the future in the professional curriculum.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):156. doi: 10.5688/aj7308156.
4
Preprofessional curriculum in preparation for doctor of pharmacy educational programs.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):155. doi: 10.5688/aj7308155.
5
Curriculum reform in Finnish pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):151. doi: 10.5688/aj7308151.
6
A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Nov 15;78(9):160. doi: 10.5688/ajpe789160.
7
Preparing pharmacy graduates for traditional and emerging career opportunities.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):157. doi: 10.5688/aj7308157.
8
Curricular mapping: process and product.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):100. doi: 10.5688/aj7205100.
9
A model for curricular quality assessment and improvement.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):196. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510196.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Identifying High-Impact and Managing Low-Impact Assessment Practices.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Sep;83(7):7496. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7496.
4
Implementation of Competency-Based Pharmacy Education (CBPE).
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Feb 21;5(1):10. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5010010.
7
Building a multi-institutional community of practice to foster assessment.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 May 10;76(4):58. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76458.
8
Assessment of human patient simulation-based learning.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):208. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510208.
9
A curriculum development simulation in a graduate program.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Nov 10;75(9):184. doi: 10.5688/ajpe759184.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing competencies for the future in the professional curriculum.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):156. doi: 10.5688/aj7308156.
2
Best practices assessment to guide curricular change in a bachelor of pharmacy program.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):12. doi: 10.5688/aj730112.
3
Fitting it all in: integration of 12 cross-cutting themes into a School of Medicine curriculum.
Med Teach. 2007 Jun;29(5):489-94. doi: 10.1080/01421590701288564.
4
Evaluation of curricula in higher education: challenges for evaluators.
Eval Rev. 2006 Aug;30(4):430-50. doi: 10.1177/0193841X05285077.
5
Planning and implementing an undergraduate medical curriculum: the lessons learned.
Med Teach. 2003 Nov;25(6):596-608. doi: 10.1080/0142159032000144383.
6
Multidimensional outcome considerations in assessing the efficacy of medical educational programs.
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Summer;15(3):210-4. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1503_10.
7
An anticipatory quality improvement process for curricular reform.
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):930. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00033.
8
Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed.
Acad Med. 2000 Jun;75(6):575-94. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200006000-00006.
9
Institutional change: embracing the initiative to train more generalists.
Acad Med. 1999 Jan;74(1 Suppl):S3-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199901001-00024.
10
Reflections on relevance, resistance, and reform in medical education.
Acad Med. 1998 Sep;73(9 Suppl):S60-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809001-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验