Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Dev Comp Immunol. 2011 Sep;35(9):959-74. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.12.009. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
The arms race between hosts and pathogens (and other non-self) drives the molecular diversification of immune response genes in the host. Over long periods of evolutionary time, many different defense strategies have been employed by a wide variety of invertebrates. We review here penaeidins and crustins in crustaceans, the allorecognition system encoded by fuhc, fester and Uncle fester in a colonial tunicate, Dscam and PGRPs in arthropods, FREPs in snails, VCBPs in protochordates, and the Sp185/333 system in the purple sea urchin. Comparisons among immune systems, including those reviewed here have not identified an immune specific regulatory "genetic toolkit", however, repeatedly identified sequences (or "building materials" on which the tools act) are present in a broad range of immune systems. These include a Toll/TLR system, a primitive complement system, an LPS binding protein, and a RAG core/Transib element. Repeatedly identified domains and motifs that function in immune proteins include NACHT, LRR, Ig, death, TIR, lectin domains, and a thioester motif. In addition, there are repeatedly identified mechanisms (or "construction methods") that generate sequence diversity in genes with immune function. These include genomic instability, duplications and/or deletions of sequences and the generation of clusters of similar genes or exons that appear as families, gene recombination, gene conversion, retrotransposition, alternative splicing, multiple alleles for single copy genes, and RNA editing. These commonly employed "materials and methods" for building and maintaining an effective immune system that might have been part of that ancestral system appear now as a fragmented and likely incomplete set, likely due to the rapid evolutionary change (or loss) of host genes that are under pressure to keep pace with pathogen diversity.
宿主与病原体(和其他非自身)之间的军备竞赛推动了宿主免疫反应基因的分子多样化。在漫长的进化过程中,许多不同的防御策略被广泛的无脊椎动物所采用。我们在这里回顾了甲壳类动物中的 penaeidins 和 crustins、多细胞海鞘中的 fuhc、fester 和 Uncle fester 编码的同种异体识别系统、节肢动物中的 Dscam 和 PGRPs、蜗牛中的 FREPs、原索动物中的 VCBPs 以及紫海胆中的 Sp185/333 系统。对免疫系统的比较,包括我们在这里回顾的那些,并没有确定一个免疫特定的调节“遗传工具包”,然而,在广泛的免疫系统中都存在着被多次识别的序列(或“工具作用的构建材料”)。这些包括 Toll/TLR 系统、原始补体系统、LPS 结合蛋白和 RAG 核心/Transib 元件。在免疫蛋白中多次被识别的功能域和基序包括 NACHT、LRR、Ig、死亡、TIR、凝集素结构域和硫酯基序。此外,还有多次被识别的机制(或“构建方法”),这些机制在具有免疫功能的基因中产生序列多样性。这些包括基因组不稳定性、序列的重复和/或缺失以及类似基因或外显子簇的产生,这些簇表现为家族、基因重组、基因转换、反转录转座、选择性剪接、单个拷贝基因的多个等位基因以及 RNA 编辑。这些用于构建和维持有效免疫系统的常用“材料和方法”可能是该祖先系统的一部分,现在似乎是一个碎片化的、可能不完整的集合,这可能是由于宿主基因的快速进化变化(或丢失),这些基因承受着与病原体多样性保持同步的压力。