Mamber S W, Brookshire K W, Forenza S
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492-7440.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jun;34(6):1237-43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.6.1237.
A number of nucleosides with anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activity were evaluated in two colorimetric (beta-galactosidase) assays for induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli. 3'-Azido-3'-deoxythymidine (azidothymidine; AZT), 2',3'-dideoxyadenosine (ddA), 2',3'-dideoxyguanosine (ddG), and 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) induced cell filamentation (sulA) and prophage lambda in well-agar diffusion and liquid microsuspension assays. AZT was approximately 100 times more potent than the dideoxypurine nucleosides, inducing sulA at less than 100 ng/ml. 2',3'-Dideoxythymidine (ddT) and 2',3'-dideoxy-2',3'-didehydrothymidine (D4T) induced sulA at 100 to 1,000 micrograms/ml, while 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC) weakly induced prophage lambda. Activity relationships thus were AZT greater than ddA greater than or equal to ddI greater than or equal to ddG greater than ddT = D4T greater than ddC. ddA and ddI had equivalent activities in agar diffusion assays, but different activity profiles were observed in liquid microsuspension assays. The differences may be related to drug metabolism. AZT and ddA showed marginal effects in a DNA repair (preferential toxicity) assay in which E. coli WP2 and CM871 uvrA recA lexA were used. Furthermore, none of the agents was able to preferentially inhibit Bacillus subtilis M45 recA relative to wild-type strain H17. These data suggest that AZT and the dideoxynucleosides do not cause DNA lesions that are repairable by excision repair and/or error-free postreplication repair processes. Rather, the SOS response appears to be induced by DNA chain termination leading to the inhibition of DNA replication. Bacterial assays for induction of the SOS response may be useful as simple, rapid prescreens for the discovery of new anti-HIV agents. Moreover, such assays may provide an additional parameter in the evaluation of agents with demonstrated activity against HIV and other retroviruses.
在两种比色法(β-半乳糖苷酶)试验中,对多种具有抗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)活性的核苷进行了评估,以检测其在大肠杆菌中诱导SOS应答的情况。在琼脂扩散和液体微量悬浮试验中,3'-叠氮基-3'-脱氧胸苷(叠氮胸苷;AZT)、2',3'-二脱氧腺苷(ddA)、2',3'-二脱氧鸟苷(ddG)和2',3'-二脱氧肌苷(ddI)均诱导了细胞丝化(sulA)和原噬菌体λ。在琼脂扩散试验中,AZT的效力比双脱氧嘌呤核苷强约100倍,在浓度低于100 ng/ml时就能诱导sulA。2',3'-二脱氧胸苷(ddT)和2',3'-二脱氧-2',3'-双氢胸苷(D4T)在100至1000 μg/ml时诱导sulA,而2',3'-二脱氧胞苷(ddC)对原噬菌体λ的诱导作用较弱。因此,活性关系为AZT>ddA≥ddI≥ddG>ddT = D4T>ddC。在琼脂扩散试验中,ddA和ddI具有等效活性,但在液体微量悬浮试验中观察到了不同的活性谱。这些差异可能与药物代谢有关。在使用大肠杆菌WP2和CM871 uvrA recA lexA的DNA修复(优先毒性)试验中,AZT和ddA显示出边际效应。此外,相对于野生型菌株H17,这些药物均无法优先抑制枯草芽孢杆菌M45 recA。这些数据表明,AZT和双脱氧核苷不会导致可通过切除修复和/或无差错复制后修复过程修复的DNA损伤。相反,SOS应答似乎是由DNA链终止导致DNA复制抑制所诱导的。用于诱导SOS应答的细菌试验作为发现新型抗HIV药物的简单、快速预筛选方法可能很有用。此外,此类试验可能为评估已证明对HIV和其他逆转录病毒具有活性的药物提供一个额外参数。