Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Feb;49(2):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
Optimal use of assessment instruments for the detection and diagnosis of eating disorders (ED) depends on the availability of normative data. The aim of this work was to, for the first time, collect norms for both the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and the newly developed Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) Scale from a general population of young women in Sweden, as well as from a clinical population of ED patients in Sweden. Participants were composed of both a randomized sample from the general population of women aged 18-30 years (N = 760) as well as from a clinical population aged 18-66 years (N = 2383). Data for the clinical population was extracted from the Stepwise database. Mean scores, standard deviations and percentile ranks for the global for the EDE-Q (as well as its subscales) and the CIA are presented. Prevalence figures of key eating disorder behaviors are also reported. Comparisons are made between the results in the present study with other existing normative studies on the EDE-Q and the CIA. The present study contributes to improving the accuracy of the interpretation of scores of the widely used self-report measure of ED, the EDE-Q, and the CIA, both of which play important roles in for diagnosis, prevention and intervention of ED.
最佳使用评估工具来检测和诊断饮食障碍(ED)取决于可用的规范数据。本工作的目的是首次从瑞典的年轻女性一般人群和瑞典的 ED 患者临床人群中收集饮食障碍检查问卷(EDE-Q)和新开发的临床损伤评估(CIA)量表的规范。参与者由年龄在 18-30 岁的女性一般人群的随机样本(N=760)以及年龄在 18-66 岁的临床人群(N=2383)组成。临床人群的数据从逐步数据库中提取。呈现了 EDE-Q(及其分量表)和 CIA 的全球总分的平均分数、标准差和百分位数等级。还报告了关键饮食障碍行为的流行率数据。将本研究的结果与其他关于 EDE-Q 和 CIA 的现有规范研究进行了比较。本研究有助于提高广泛使用的 ED 自我报告测量工具,即 EDE-Q 和 CIA 的分数解释的准确性,这两者在 ED 的诊断、预防和干预中都起着重要作用。