Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助分析的数字比值证实了多囊卵巢综合征临床表型中不存在产前雄激素暴露的解剖学证据。

Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome.

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture of Life Sciences, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Dec 29;8:156. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-156.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previous study where women with PCOS had lower right hand 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls. Both these studies used Vernier calipers to measure finger lengths--a method recently shown to be less reliable at obtaining finger length measurements than computer-assisted analysis.

METHODS

Ninety-six women diagnosed with PCOS according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria had their finger lengths measured with computer-assisted analysis. Participants were categorized into four recognized phenotypes of PCOS and their 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls (n = 48) and men (n = 50).

RESULTS

Digit ratios assessed by computer-assisted analysis in women with PCOS did not differ from female controls, but were significantly lower in men. When subjects were stratified by PCOS phenotype, 2D:4D did not differ among phenotypes or when compared to female controls.

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted measurements validated that digit ratios of women with PCOS do not show anatomical evidence of increased prenatal androgen exposure.

摘要

背景

我们最近发现,四种多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)临床表型的女性并没有表现出产前雄激素暴露升高的解剖学证据,这可以通过较低的食指(2D)与环指(4D)比值来判断。然而,这些发现与之前的一项研究结果相矛盾,该研究表明 PCOS 女性的右手 2D:4D 比值低于健康女性对照组。这两项研究都使用游标卡尺来测量手指长度——最近的研究表明,这种方法在获取手指长度测量值方面不如计算机辅助分析可靠。

方法

根据 2003 年鹿特丹标准诊断为 PCOS 的 96 名女性使用计算机辅助分析测量其手指长度。将参与者分为四个公认的 PCOS 表型,并将其 2D:4D 与健康女性对照组(n = 48)和男性(n = 50)进行比较。

结果

PCOS 女性的计算机辅助分析评估的数字比值与女性对照组没有差异,但明显低于男性。当根据 PCOS 表型对受试者进行分层时,各表型之间或与女性对照组相比,2D:4D 均无差异。

结论

计算机辅助测量验证了 PCOS 女性的数字比值没有表现出增加的产前雄激素暴露的解剖学证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/263f/3022844/f581beef60da/1477-7827-8-156-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验