Allaway Heather C, Bloski Terri G, Pierson Roger A, Lujan Marla E
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Am J Hum Biol. 2009 May-Jun;21(3):365-70. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20892.
Prenatal androgens influence the second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) of hands with men having lower ratios than women. Numerous methods are used to assess 2D:4D including, physical measurements with calipers, and measurements made from photocopies, scanned images, digital photographs, radiographs, and scaled tubes. Although each method appears relatively reliable, agreement upon a gold standard is necessary to better explore the putative effects of prenatal androgens. Our objective was to assess the level of intra and interobserver reliability when evaluating 2D:4D using four techniques: (1) physical measurements, (2) photocopies, (3) printed scanned images, and (4) computer-assisted image analysis. Physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scanned images were measured with Vernier calipers. Scanned images were also measured with computer-based calipers. Measurements were made in 30 men and 30 women at two different time points, by three experienced observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the level of reliability. Intraobserver reliability was best for computer-assisted (0.957), followed by photocopies (0.939), physical measurements (0.925), and printed scans (0.842; P = 0.015). Interobserver reliability was also greatest for computer-assisted (0.892), followed by photocopies (0.858), physical measurements (0.795), and printed scans (0.761; P = 0.001). Mean 2D:4D from physical measurements were higher than all other techniques (P < 0.0001). Digit ratios determined from computer-assisted, physical measurements, and printed scans were more reliable in men than women (P = 0.009, P = 0.017, and P = 0.012, respectively). In summary, 2D:4D determined from computer-assisted analysis yielded the most accurate and consistent measurements among observers. Investigations of 2D:4D should use computer-assisted measurements over alternate methods whenever possible.
产前雄激素会影响手部的食指与无名指比例(2D:4D),男性的该比例低于女性。评估2D:4D的方法众多,包括用卡尺进行物理测量,以及对影印件、扫描图像、数码照片、X光片和刻度管进行测量。尽管每种方法看起来都相对可靠,但为了更好地探究产前雄激素的假定影响,有必要达成一个金标准。我们的目标是评估使用四种技术评估2D:4D时观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性水平:(1)物理测量,(2)影印件,(3)打印的扫描图像,以及(4)计算机辅助图像分析。物理测量、影印件和打印的扫描图像用游标卡尺测量。扫描图像也用基于计算机的卡尺测量。由三位经验丰富的观察者在两个不同时间点对30名男性和30名女性进行测量。组内相关系数用于评估可靠性水平。观察者内部可靠性以计算机辅助测量最高(0.957),其次是影印件(0.939)、物理测量(0.925)和打印扫描(0.842;P = 0.015)。观察者之间的可靠性也是计算机辅助测量最高(0.892),其次是影印件(0.858)、物理测量(0.795)和打印扫描(0.761;P = 0.001)。物理测量得出的平均2D:4D高于所有其他技术(P < 0.0001)。通过计算机辅助、物理测量和打印扫描确定的指比在男性中比女性更可靠(分别为P = 0.009、P = 0.017和P = 0.012)。总之,通过计算机辅助分析确定的2D:4D在观察者之间产生了最准确和一致的测量结果。对2D:4D的研究应尽可能使用计算机辅助测量而非其他方法。