• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种根管充填材料对感染的无活力乳牙微生物群杀菌潜力的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth.

作者信息

Harini Priya M, Bhat Sham S, Sundeep Hegde K

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Yenepoya Dental College Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka State, India.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Fall;35(1):23-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.1.u57p4500360g2752.

DOI:10.17796/jcpd.35.1.u57p4500360g2752
PMID:21189760
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Since complete debridement of the root canals of the primary teeth is not practically possible due to the highly variable root canal anatomy, success of the endodontic therapy depends partly on the use ofantibacterial irrigating agents and root canal filling materials. Recent literature indicates that anaerobes comprise a majority of the bacteria in necrotic root canals ofprimary teeth. The study determined the antibacterial effectiveness of four root canal filling materials namely Calcium hydroxide, Zinc oxide eugenol, Vitapex and Metapex against microbial specimens obtained directly from necrotic root canals of primary teeth.

METHOD

Microbial specimens were collected using sterile paper points, from 15 primary maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth of randomly selected children in the age group of 4-10 years with infected non vital primary teeth, requiring pulpectomy procedure. The microbial specimens collected were subjected to microbiological analysis and the antimicrobial potential of root canal filling materials were tested using Agar diffusion technique.

RESULTS

were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Facultative/Aerobic organisms were isolated in all the cases, anaerobic organisms were isolated in 80% of the cases, and Candida albicans was isolated in 1 case. ZOE showed superior inhibitory activity against most of the organisms isolated followed by Vitapex, Calcium hydroxide and Metapex in descending order.

CONCLUSION

Our data may be useful as a guide for relative antimicrobial effectiveness or non-effectiveness of the materials employed. In vivo studies are required to state the specific antimicrobial activity and merits and demerits of any of the test filling material.

摘要

背景与目的

由于乳牙根管解剖结构高度多变,实际不可能完全清创乳牙根管,因此牙髓治疗的成功部分取决于抗菌冲洗剂和根管充填材料的使用。近期文献表明,厌氧菌在乳牙坏死根管中的细菌中占大多数。本研究测定了四种根管充填材料,即氢氧化钙、氧化锌丁香酚、Vitapex和Metapex对直接从乳牙坏死根管中获取的微生物标本的抗菌效果。

方法

使用无菌纸尖从随机选取的4至10岁患有感染性非活髓乳牙且需要进行牙髓摘除术的儿童的15颗上颌和下颌乳后牙中收集微生物标本。对收集的微生物标本进行微生物学分析,并使用琼脂扩散技术测试根管充填材料的抗菌潜力。

结果

采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。所有病例均分离出兼性/需氧菌,80%的病例分离出厌氧菌,1例分离出白色念珠菌。氧化锌丁香酚对大多数分离出的微生物显示出较强的抑制活性,其次是Vitapex、氢氧化钙和Metapex,活性依次递减。

结论

我们的数据可作为所使用材料相对抗菌有效性或无效性的指导。需要进行体内研究以阐明任何一种测试充填材料的具体抗菌活性及其优缺点。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth.四种根管充填材料对感染的无活力乳牙微生物群杀菌潜力的比较评估
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Fall;35(1):23-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.1.u57p4500360g2752.
2
Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials along with aloevera used in primary teeth: a microbiological study.各种根管充填材料联合芦荟用于乳牙的抗菌效果比较评价:一项微生物学研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):257-62. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.j62u53q2300484x5.
3
In vitro inhibition of bacteria from root canals of primary teeth by various dental materials.不同牙科材料对乳牙根管细菌的体外抑制作用
Pediatr Dent. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):351-5.
4
Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials.根管充填材料对口腔细菌纯培养物的抑制作用。
Pediatr Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec;18(7):444-9.
5
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: a microbiological study.乳牙中使用的各种根管充填材料抗菌效果的评估:一项微生物学研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007 Spring;31(3):193-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.31.3.t73r4061424j2578.
6
Antibacterial Efficacy of Pastes Against E Faecalis in Primary Root Dentin: A Confocal Microscope Study.糊剂对原发性牙根牙本质中粪肠球菌的抗菌效果:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Spring;39(3):247-54. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.3.247.
7
An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of primary root canal filling materials.根管充填材料抗菌效果的体外评价
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Fall;37(1):59-64. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.1.v6305588xw525505.
8
Comparison of the antibacterial effect of modified 3-mix paste versus Ultrapex over anaerobic microorganisms from infected root canals of primary teeth: an in vitro study.改良三联糊剂与Ultrapex对乳牙感染根管内厌氧微生物抗菌效果的比较:一项体外研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Spring;36(3):239-44. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.3.m2678g0175157282.
9
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomy in primary teeth: a 18-months clinical randomized controlled trial.乳牙牙髓切断术的临床和影像学评估:一项 18 个月的临床随机对照试验。
Head Face Med. 2017 Oct 27;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0145-1.
10
Antibacterial activity of root canal filling materials for primary teeth: zinc oxide and eugenol cement, Calen paste thickened with zinc oxide, Sealapex and EndoREZ.乳牙根管充填材料的抗菌活性:氧化锌丁香酚水门汀、氧化锌增稠的卡连糊剂、赛乐普糊剂和恩多雷斯糊剂。
Braz Dent J. 2009;20(4):290-6. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000400005.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Using a Combination of Zinc Oxide and Nano-Hydroxyapatite With Ozonated Oil and Endoflas as an Obturating Material in Primary Teeth: A Prospective Study.使用氧化锌与纳米羟基磷灰石、臭氧化油和Endoflas组合作为乳牙充填材料的临床和影像学结果的比较分析:一项前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85213. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85213. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Propylene Glycol Potentiates the Inhibitory Action of CTZ Paste on Antibiotic-Resistant Isolated from the Root Canal: An In Vitro Study.丙二醇增强CTZ糊剂对根管分离出的耐抗生素菌的抑制作用:一项体外研究。
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 31;11(9):2208. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092208.
3
Comparative evaluation of a modified endodontic approach using L. and conventional pulpectomy in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.
使用L.的改良牙髓治疗方法与传统乳牙牙髓摘除术在乳磨牙中的比较评估:一项随机临床试验。
Ayu. 2021 Jul-Sep;42(3):130-137. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_12_20. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
Comparative study of pulpal responses to ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex in canine teeth.犬齿牙髓对ProRoot MTA、Vitapex和Metapex反应的比较研究。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Oct;16(4):1274-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of : A Microbiological Study.五种根管封闭剂对临床分离株抗真菌疗效的比较评价:一项微生物学研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):119-123. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1718.
6
Antibacterial Effects of Chitosan, Formocresol and CMCP as Pulpectomy Medicament on , and .壳聚糖、甲醛甲酚和CMCP作为牙髓摘除术药物对[具体细菌]、[具体细菌]和[具体细菌]的抗菌作用
Iran Endod J. 2018 Summer;13(3):342-350. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.20791.
7
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomy in primary teeth: a 18-months clinical randomized controlled trial.乳牙牙髓切断术的临床和影像学评估:一项 18 个月的临床随机对照试验。
Head Face Med. 2017 Oct 27;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0145-1.