Suppr超能文献

根管充填材料对口腔细菌纯培养物的抑制作用。

Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials.

作者信息

Tchaou W S, Turng B F, Minah G E, Coll J A

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec;18(7):444-9.

PMID:8970206
Abstract

This study compared the antimicrobial effectiveness of nine dental materials and a negative control agent against 21 strains or species of bacteria using an agar diffusion assay. The materials were: 1. Camphorated parachlorophenol mixed with calcium hydroxide (CPC + Ca(OH)2). 2. CPC mixed with zinc oxide (CPC + ZnO). 3. Formocresol mixed with zinc oxide and eugenol (FC + ZOE). 4. Chlorhexidine mixed with ZOE (CHX + ZOE). 5. Kri paste. 6. ZOE. 7. Zinc oxide mixed with sterile water (ZnO + H2O). 8. Calcium hydroxide mixed with sterile water (Ca(OH)2 + H2O). 9. Vitapex. 10. Vaseline (control). The test bacteria represented species commonly isolated from nonvital primary and permanent tooth root canals. The antimicrobial effectiveness of the materials was divided into five groups based on the diameters of the zones of inhibition against all test bacteria and distribution of the data. All materials except Vaseline showed antimicrobial activity against some of the 21 organisms. Generally, all materials inhibited gram-negative anaerobic bacteria more effectively than aerotolerant gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria. Materials containing CPC or FC (except Kri paste) produced strong or medium strong inhibition against most bacteria. CHX + ZOE, Kri paste, ZnO + H2O, and ZOE inhibited all or most bacteria, but to lesser extent than CPC + Ca(OH)2, CPC + ZnO, or FC + ZOE. Ca(OH)2 + H2O, Vitapex, and Vaseline generally were nonihibitory. The findings should allow a comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effectiveness to be made of materials commonly used in pulpectomy procedures with primary teeth.

摘要

本研究采用琼脂扩散试验,比较了九种牙科材料和一种阴性对照剂对21种细菌菌株或菌种的抗菌效果。这些材料分别是:1. 樟脑对氯苯酚与氢氧化钙混合剂(CPC + Ca(OH)₂)。2. CPC与氧化锌混合剂(CPC + ZnO)。3. 甲醛甲酚与氧化锌和丁香酚混合剂(FC + ZOE)。4. 氯己定与ZOE混合剂(CHX + ZOE)。5. Kri糊剂。6. ZOE。7. 氧化锌与无菌水混合剂(ZnO + H₂O)。8. 氢氧化钙与无菌水混合剂(Ca(OH)₂ + H₂O)。9. 维他派克斯。10. 凡士林(对照)。测试细菌代表了通常从无活力的乳牙和恒牙根管中分离出的菌种。根据对所有测试细菌的抑菌圈直径和数据分布,将材料的抗菌效果分为五组。除凡士林外,所有材料对21种微生物中的一些都表现出抗菌活性。一般来说,所有材料对革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的抑制作用比对兼性革兰氏阴性菌或革兰氏阳性菌更有效。含CPC或FC的材料(Kri糊剂除外)对大多数细菌产生强或中等强度的抑制作用。CHX + ZOE、Kri糊剂、ZnO + H₂O和ZOE抑制了所有或大多数细菌,但程度低于CPC + Ca(OH)₂、CPC + ZnO或FC + ZOE。Ca(OH)₂ + H₂O、维他派克斯和凡士林通常无抑制作用。这些发现应有助于对乳牙牙髓摘除术常用材料的抗菌效果进行比较评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验