• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病宾果游戏:与菲律宾社区共同确定研究重点

Diabetes bingo: research prioritization with the Filipino community.

作者信息

Leake Anne R, Oculto Tessie, Ramones Emilyn, Caagbay Cedric R

机构信息

School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA.

出版信息

Hawaii Med J. 2010 Oct;69(10):237-41.

PMID:21229487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3071184/
Abstract

This community-based participatory research, conducted in partnership between a European-American academic researcher and a professional group of Filipino nurses, aimed to determine the diabetes research priority for the Filipino community on the island of Oahu in Hawaii, and to evaluate the multi-voting technique to seek input from the community. The study design was a qualitative, cross-sectional interactive process consisting of an educational presentation followed by data collection from the audience. Ten community presentations about the impact of diabetes on the Filipino community were conducted by a Filipino nurse with participants (N=265). Following the educational session, the participants selected priorities for research using a multi-vote technique developed as a Diabetes Bingo card. Community voting results identified prevention and a focus on adults as important priorities for research. Based on the results of the multi-voting, the research partners were able to come to consensus on a research priority area of prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults. Multi-voting using a Diabetes Bingo card, preceded by an educational presentation by a Filipino nurse, was a culturally competent community-based participatory research method that gave voice to the participants and direction to the research partners for future projects. The multi-voting technique was readily accepted and enjoyed by participants.

摘要

这项基于社区的参与性研究由一位欧美学术研究人员与一组菲律宾专业护士合作开展,旨在确定夏威夷瓦胡岛菲律宾社区的糖尿病研究重点,并评估用于征求社区意见的多重投票技术。该研究设计是一个定性的横断面互动过程,包括一次教育讲座,随后从听众中收集数据。一位菲律宾护士就糖尿病对菲律宾社区的影响进行了十次社区讲座,共有265名参与者。在教育环节之后,参与者使用一种开发成糖尿病宾果卡的多重投票技术来选择研究重点。社区投票结果确定预防以及关注成年人是重要的研究重点。基于多重投票的结果,研究伙伴们能够就成人2型糖尿病预防这一研究重点领域达成共识。在菲律宾护士进行教育讲座之后使用糖尿病宾果卡进行多重投票,是一种具有文化适应性的基于社区的参与性研究方法,它让参与者有了发言权,并为研究伙伴们未来的项目指明了方向。多重投票技术很容易被参与者接受并受到他们的喜爱。

相似文献

1
Diabetes bingo: research prioritization with the Filipino community.糖尿病宾果游戏:与菲律宾社区共同确定研究重点
Hawaii Med J. 2010 Oct;69(10):237-41.
2
Lessons learned from a community-academic partnership addressing adolescent pregnancy prevention in Filipino American families.从一个致力于预防菲律宾裔美国家庭青少年怀孕的社区-学术伙伴关系中汲取的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):305-13. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0023.
3
Health is wealth: methods to improve attendance in a lifestyle intervention for a largely immigrant Filipino-American sample.健康就是财富:提高生活方式干预参与率的方法,该方法针对的是主要为菲律宾裔美国移民的人群。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Jun;14(3):475-80. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9487-0.
4
Barriers and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among Filipino men in Hawaii.夏威夷菲律宾男性前列腺癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Mar;38(2):227-33. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.227-233.
5
Development of Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles for Diabetes, a culturally tailored diabetes self-management education and support programme for Black-British adults: A participatory research approach.为糖尿病患者开发健康饮食与积极生活方式:一项针对英国黑人成年人的文化定制糖尿病自我管理教育与支持项目——参与式研究方法
Diabet Med. 2021 Nov;38(11):e14594. doi: 10.1111/dme.14594. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy in Filipino vs Caucasian Americans: a retrospective cross-sectional epidemiologic study of two convenience samples.菲律宾裔美国人与高加索裔美国人的糖尿病和糖尿病性视网膜病变患病率:两项便利样本回顾性横断面流行病学研究。
Ethn Dis. 2012 Autumn;22(4):459-65.
7
Making diabetes self-management education culturally relevant for Filipino Americans in Hawaii.使糖尿病自我管理教育与夏威夷的菲律宾裔美国人的文化相关。
Diabetes Educ. 2008 Sep-Oct;34(5):841-53. doi: 10.1177/0145721708323098.
8
Lifestyle intervention for Filipino Americans at risk for diabetes.
J Community Health Nurs. 2014;31(4):225-37. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2014.926674.
9
Hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes among Filipino women in the Philippines, Hawaii, and San Diego.菲律宾、夏威夷和圣地亚哥的菲律宾女性中的高血糖和2型糖尿病。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006 Mar;71(3):306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
10
Translating diabetes prevention into native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities: the PILI 'Ohana Pilot project.将糖尿病预防引入夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民社区:皮利大家庭试点项目。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Spring;4(1):7-16. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0111.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes-related research priorities of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany.1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病相关研究重点:德国的一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 2;12(1):20835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24180-y.
2
Recruiting Filipino Immigrants in a Randomized Controlled Trial Promoting Enrollment in an Evidence-Based Parenting Intervention.在一项随机对照试验中招募菲律宾移民,以促进参与基于证据的育儿干预。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Apr;21(2):324-331. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0755-0.
3
Health is wealth: methods to improve attendance in a lifestyle intervention for a largely immigrant Filipino-American sample.健康就是财富:提高生活方式干预参与率的方法,该方法针对的是主要为菲律宾裔美国移民的人群。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Jun;14(3):475-80. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9487-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Type 2 diabetes in native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in Hawaii.夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民中的2型糖尿病
Pac Health Dialog. 2005 Sep;12(2):103-10.
2
Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology.评估研究的相关性、普遍性和适用性:外部验证与转化方法中的问题。
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Mar;29(1):126-53. doi: 10.1177/0163278705284445.
3
Metabolic syndrome in a multiethnic population in rural Hawaii.夏威夷农村多民族人群中的代谢综合征
Ethn Dis. 2005 Spring;15(2):233-7.
4
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.基于社区的参与性研究:评估证据
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004 Aug(99):1-8.
5
Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale.对李克特量表反应的文化差异。
Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):295-306. doi: 10.1002/nur.10041.
6
Type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in Filipina-American women : a high-risk nonobese population.菲律宾裔美国女性中的2型糖尿病和代谢综合征:高危非肥胖人群。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):494-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.3.494.
7
Prevalence and determinants of type 2 diabetes among Filipino-Americans in the Houston, Texas metropolitan statistical area.
Diabetes Care. 2001 Dec;24(12):2054-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.12.2054.
8
The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?名义群体技术:一种适用于全科医疗的研究工具?
Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):76-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76.
9
The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing?德尔菲法:一种对护理工作有价值的研究方法?
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jun;19(6):1221-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x.