Lee Jerry W, Jones Patricia S, Mineyama Yoshimitsu, Zhang Xinwei Esther
Loma Linda University School of Public Health, CA 92350, USA.
Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):295-306. doi: 10.1002/nur.10041.
Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale were examined. Self-identified Chinese, Japanese, and Americans (N=136, 323, and 160, respectively) recruited at ethnic or general supermarkets in Southern California completed a 13-question Sense of Coherence scale with a choice of either four, five, or seven responses in either Chinese, Japanese, or English. The Japanese respondents more frequently reported difficulty with the scale, the Chinese more frequently skipped questions, and both these groups selected the midpoint more frequently on items that involved admitting to a positive emotion than did the Americans, who were more likely to indicate a positive emotion. Construct validity of the scale tended to be better for the Chinese and the Americans when there were four response choices and for the Japanese when there were seven. Although culture affected response patterns, the association of sense of coherence and health was positive in all three cultural groups.
研究了对李克特量表回答的文化差异。在南加州的民族超市或普通超市招募的自我认定为中国人、日本人及美国人(分别为N = 136、323和160),用中文、日文或英文完成了一份包含13个问题的连贯感量表,回答选项有四个、五个或七个。日本受访者更频繁地报告在量表上有困难,中国受访者更频繁地跳过问题,在涉及承认积极情绪的项目上,这两组人比美国人更频繁地选择中间点,而美国人更倾向于表明积极情绪。当有四个回答选项时,该量表的结构效度对中国人和美国人往往更好,当有七个回答选项时,对日本人更好。尽管文化影响回答模式,但在所有三个文化群体中,连贯感与健康的关联都是积极的。