• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

名义群体技术:一种适用于全科医疗的研究工具?

The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?

作者信息

Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C, Webb I

机构信息

Central Surgery, South Shields.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):76-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/10.1.76
PMID:8477899
Abstract

Qualitative methods are increasingly recognized as valuable, yet practitioners face difficult decisions in their choice of method and the process of analysis. The nominal group technique combines quantitative and qualitative data collection in a group setting, and avoids problems of group dynamics associated with other group methods such as brainstorming, Delphi and focus groups. Idea generation and problem solving are combined in a structured group process, which encourages and enhances the participation of group members. The stages involved in conducting a nominal group are described, and practical problems of its use in a health care setting are discussed with reference to a study of the priorities of care of diabetic patients, carers and health professionals. Some potential applications of the technique in audit and exploratory research are also outlined.

摘要

定性方法越来越被认为具有价值,但从业者在方法选择和分析过程中面临艰难的决策。名义小组技术在小组环境中结合了定量和定性数据收集,避免了与头脑风暴、德尔菲法和焦点小组等其他小组方法相关的群体动态问题。在一个结构化的小组过程中,想法产生和问题解决相结合,这鼓励并增强了小组成员的参与度。描述了进行名义小组的各个阶段,并结合一项关于糖尿病患者、护理人员和医疗专业人员护理优先级的研究,讨论了在医疗环境中使用该技术的实际问题。还概述了该技术在审计和探索性研究中的一些潜在应用。

相似文献

1
The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?名义群体技术:一种适用于全科医疗的研究工具?
Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):76-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76.
2
A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes.对单一专业群体中疾病分类的两种共识方法进行比较,结果显示相同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;59(11):1169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
3
Indicators of the quality of general practice care of patients with chronic illness: a step towards the real involvement of patients in the assessment of the quality of care.慢性病患者全科医疗护理质量指标:迈向患者真正参与护理质量评估的一步。
Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;5(2):73-80. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.2.73.
4
Use of multiple methods to determine factors affecting quality of care of patients with diabetes.运用多种方法确定影响糖尿病患者护理质量的因素。
Fam Pract. 1999 Oct;16(5):489-94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.5.489.
5
Aggregation of qualitative studies--From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations.定性研究的汇总——从理论到实践:患者优先事项与家庭医学/全科医学评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
6
Building consensus in health care: a guide to using the nominal group technique.在医疗保健领域建立共识:使用名义群体技术指南
Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Mar;9(3):110-4. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.3.12432.
7
Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review.患者对全科医疗中优质护理的看法:文献综述
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(5):655-70. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1.
8
Audit of deaths in general practice: pilot study of the critical incident technique.全科医疗中的死亡病例审计:关键事件技术的试点研究
Qual Health Care. 1992 Dec;1(4):231-5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.4.231.
9
Focus groups.焦点小组
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.
10
Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians.焦点小组访谈:姑息治疗研究人员和临床医生指南
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003 May;9(5):202-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.5.11490.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
2
Research priorities for faecal incontinence in adults: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership.成人粪便失禁的研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70154. doi: 10.1111/codi.70154.
3
Young women's perspectives on a user-friendly self-sampling intervention to improve the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections in underserved communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省服务不足社区中年轻女性对一项便于用户操作的自我采样干预措施的看法,该措施旨在改善性传播感染的诊断情况。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03684-5.
4
Experience Group Insights of Obese Adults Aged 35-50 with Knee Osteoarthritis.35至50岁肥胖成年膝骨关节炎患者的经验组见解
J Patient Exp. 2025 May 11;12:23743735251341717. doi: 10.1177/23743735251341717. eCollection 2025.
5
Remote home visits: Exploring the concept and applications of remote home visits within health and social care settings.远程家访:探索健康与社会照护环境中远程家访的概念及应用
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Jan;85(1):50-61. doi: 10.1177/03080226211000265. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
6
Building competency in artificial intelligence and bias mitigation for nurse scientists and aligned health researchers.培养护士科学家和相关健康研究人员在人工智能及减轻偏差方面的能力。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 May-Jun;73(3):102395. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102395. Epub 2025 May 2.
7
Developing a pharmacist preceptorship programme to support UK advanced level practice: a consensus study.制定药剂师带教计划以支持英国高级水平实践:一项共识研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01909-z.
8
Key Outcomes for a Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention for People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Nominal Group Technique Study.针对多发性硬化症患者的职业康复干预关键成果:一项名义小组技术研究
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70265. doi: 10.1111/hex.70265.
9
Partnering with periodontal patients and care providers to establish research priorities for patient engagement in specialized periodontal care: A study protocol.与牙周病患者及护理人员合作,确定患者参与专科牙周护理的研究重点:一项研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319841. eCollection 2025.
10
Root causes of low influenza vaccination coverage rates among nurses working in a tertiary care university hospital in Turkey: result of a study using nominal group technique.土耳其一所三级护理大学医院护士流感疫苗接种覆盖率低的根本原因:采用名义群体技术的研究结果
Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2025 Jan;14(1):35-43. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e6. Epub 2025 Jan 16.