Suppr超能文献

直肠腺癌的直肠内超声——文献结果真的与常规临床实践相符吗?

Endorectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma--do the literature results really correspond to the realities of routine clinical care?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Charlottenstrasse 72, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2011 May;43(5):425-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256111. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

This multicenter, prospective, country-wide quality-assurance study at more than 300 hospitals in Germany was designed to characterize and analyze the diagnostic accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the routine clinical staging of rectal carcinoma (depth of tumor infiltration).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were surveyed between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2008. Those who received neoadjuvant therapy after EUS were excluded. The correspondence between the EUS assessment of tumor depth (uT) and that determined by histology (pT) was calculated, and the influence of hospital volume upon the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values was investigated.

RESULTS

At 384 hospitals providing care at all levels, 29 206 patients were included; of the 27 458 treated by surgical resection, EUS was performed for 12 235 (44.6 %). Of these, 7096 did not receive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, allowing a uT-pT comparison. The uT-pT correspondence was 64.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 63.6 % - 65.8 %); the frequency of understaging was 18 % (95 %CI 17.1 % - 18.9 %) and that of overstaging was 17.3 % (95 %CI 16.4 % - 18.2 %). The kappa coefficient was greatest in the category T1 (κ = 0.591). For T3 tumors κ was 0.468. The poorest correspondence was found for T2 and T4 tumors (κ = 0.367 and 0.321, respectively). A breakdown by hospital volume showed that the uT-pT correspondence was 63.2 % (95 %CI 61.5 % - 64.9 %) for hospitals undertaking ≤ 10 EUS/year, 64.6 % (95 %CI 62.9 % - 66.2 %) for doing 11 - 30 EUS/year, and 73.1 % (95 %CI 69.4 % - 76.5 %) for those hospitals performing > 30 EUS/year.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical routine, the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in staging rectal carcinoma does not attain the very good results reported in the literature. Only in the hands of diagnosticians with a large case volume of rectal carcinoma patients can EUS lead to therapy-relevant decisions.

摘要

背景与研究目的

本研究在德国 300 多家医院进行,为一项多中心、前瞻性、全国范围的质量保证研究,旨在对直肠内镜超声(EUS)在直肠腺癌(肿瘤浸润深度)常规临床分期中的诊断准确性进行特征分析和评估。

患者和方法

患者纳入时间为 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日。排除接受 EUS 后新辅助治疗的患者。计算 EUS 评估的肿瘤深度(uT)与组织学确定的肿瘤深度(pT)之间的一致性,并研究医院容量对敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值的影响。

结果

在提供各级医疗服务的 384 家医院中,共纳入 29206 例患者;27458 例接受手术切除的患者中,有 12235 例行 EUS 检查(44.6%)。其中,7096 例未接受新辅助放化疗,可进行 uT-pT 比较。uT-pT 的一致性为 64.7%(95%置信区间 [CI] 63.6%至 65.8%);过度分期的频率为 18%(95%CI 17.1%至 18.9%),分期不足的频率为 17.3%(95%CI 16.4%至 18.2%)。T1 类别的kappa 系数最大(κ=0.591)。T3 肿瘤的κ值为 0.468。T2 和 T4 肿瘤的一致性最差(κ=0.367 和 0.321)。按医院容量分层显示,每年行 EUS 检查≤10 例的医院 uT-pT 一致性为 63.2%(95%CI 61.5%至 64.9%),每年行 EUS 检查 11-30 例的医院为 64.6%(95%CI 62.9%至 66.2%),每年行 EUS 检查>30 例的医院为 73.1%(95%CI 69.4%至 76.5%)。

结论

在临床常规中,直肠超声在直肠腺癌分期中的诊断准确性并未达到文献报道的非常好的结果。只有在处理大量直肠腺癌患者的诊断医生手中,EUS 才能做出与治疗相关的决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验