Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;151(3):507-13.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.09.004. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
To investigate bleb morphologic features and postoperative outcomes after Ex-PRESS drainage device (Alcon Laboratories) implantation versus trabeculectomy.
Retrospective, consecutive case-control series.
Information was collected from the charts of 35 consecutive Ex-PRESS procedures and 35 consecutive trabeculectomy procedures with at least 2 years of follow-up. Intraocular pressure (IOP), bleb morphologic features, reduction of dependence on medication, visual recovery, number of postoperative visits, and postoperative complication rates were compared between groups.
Average follow-up was 28 months (standard deviation, 3.23 months). Mean IOP measurements were similar after 6 months, then became slightly higher in the Ex-PRESS group at 1 year and at the final follow-up (P = .004 and P = .008, respectively). Final percent IOP lowering was similar between groups (P = .209). Unqualified success was achieved in 77.14% of Ex-PRESS and 74.29% of trabeculectomy procedures at last follow-up (P = 1.00). An additional 5.71% and 8.57% reached qualified success for Ex-PRESS and trabeculectomy surgeries, respectively (P = .99). Evaluation by the Moorfields Bleb Grading System revealed less vascularity and height but more diffuse area associated with the Ex-PRESS blebs, although these differences were absent at study completion. There were fewer cases of early postoperative hypotony and hyphema and quicker visual recovery in the Ex-PRESS group. The Ex-PRESS group required fewer postoperative visits compared with the trabeculectomy group (P < .000).
Success of Ex-PRESS surgery, as defined in our study, was similar to trabeculectomy. Final IOP measurements were slightly lower after trabeculectomy compared with Ex-PRESS. Differences in some postoperative outcomes faded with follow-up. There remains a need for long-term prospective studies comparing these 2 procedures.
研究 Ex-PRESS 引流装置(爱尔康实验室)植入术后与小梁切除术的滤泡形态特征和术后结果。
回顾性、连续病例对照系列。
从 35 例连续 Ex-PRESS 手术和 35 例连续小梁切除术的图表中收集信息,这些手术均有至少 2 年的随访。比较两组之间的眼压(IOP)、滤泡形态特征、减少药物依赖、视力恢复、术后就诊次数和术后并发症发生率。
平均随访 28 个月(标准差 3.23 个月)。6 个月后平均 IOP 测量值相似,然后在 Ex-PRESS 组 1 年和最终随访时略高(P =.004 和 P =.008)。最终 IOP 降低百分比在两组之间相似(P =.209)。最后随访时,Ex-PRESS 组有 77.14%的手术和小梁切除术达到非合格成功,Trabeculectomy 组有 74.29%的手术达到非合格成功(P = 1.00)。Ex-PRESS 和小梁切除术的手术分别有 5.71%和 8.57%达到合格成功(P =.99)。Moorfields 滤泡分级系统评估显示,Ex-PRESS 滤泡的血管化程度和高度较低,但面积较弥散,尽管这些差异在研究结束时并不存在。Ex-PRESS 组术后早期发生低眼压和前房积血的病例较少,视力恢复较快。与小梁切除术组相比,Ex-PRESS 组需要的术后就诊次数较少(P <.000)。
在我们的研究中,Ex-PRESS 手术的成功率与小梁切除术相似。与 Ex-PRESS 相比,小梁切除术的最终 IOP 测量值略低。一些术后结果的差异随着随访时间的延长而消失。仍需要长期前瞻性研究比较这两种手术。