• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高姑息治疗和临终关怀的技术解决方案。

A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care.

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jan;20(1):167-74. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1086-z. Epub 2011 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-011-1086-z
PMID:21240650
Abstract

PURPOSE

This project sought to help palliative and hospice care practices improve patient care quality and operational efficiency by improving patient symptom status reporting and symptom management, reducing associated provider documentation workload, and enhancing patient-provider and provider-provider communication. We developed a user-friendly, electronic medical record-compatible, software prototype that allows typical clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to be entered and stored. This data is immediately available during the clinical encounter with graphically depicted summaries for patient history and PRO assessments, a trending feature that links symptom behavior to interventions and the Edmonton Labeled Visual Information System.

METHODS

A user-centered design approach allowed for iterative cycles of needs/usability feedback from providers and patients/caregivers to be incorporated into the development of our prototype's technical structure and features. To determine the needs and initial usability of the project's prototype, we interviewed eight providers and 18 patients/caregivers. Another usability test, consisting of patient/caregiver (n = 18) and provider (n = 9) interviews, assessed the functioning prototype's design, usability, and usefulness.

RESULTS

Patients/caregivers (n = 18) reported that the prototype was usable (100%), it would facilitate patient-provider communication, shared decision making, and self-management (100%), and they would be willing to try the system and recommend it to their providers (100%). The providers (n = 9) felt that the prototype encouraged better use of patient assessments in decision making and patient care (100%) and improved identification of cause/temporal relationship between care events and outcomes (100%), monitoring of patient status (100%), communication in a multi-disciplinary team (100%), and operational efficiency and patient care quality (88.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of patient care and operational efficiency can be improved with an effective assessment, evaluation, and communication tool. This project developed an electronic version of such a tool. Future efforts will hone its usability and integration across multiple hospice/palliative care settings.

摘要

目的

本项目旨在通过改善患者症状报告和管理、减轻相关医务人员文书工作负担以及加强医患沟通和医护沟通,来帮助姑息治疗和临终关怀实践提高患者护理质量和运营效率。我们开发了一个用户友好、与电子病历兼容的软件原型,允许输入和存储典型的临床数据和患者报告的结果(PRO)。这些数据在临床就诊时可立即获得,以图形化的方式呈现患者病史和 PRO 评估的摘要,具有趋势分析功能,可将症状行为与干预措施以及埃德蒙顿标记视觉信息系统联系起来。

方法

采用以用户为中心的设计方法,允许临床医生和患者/照护者反复提出需求/可用性反馈,将其纳入我们原型的技术结构和功能的开发中。为了确定项目原型的需求和初始可用性,我们采访了 8 名临床医生和 18 名患者/照护者。另一个可用性测试包括患者/照护者(n=18)和临床医生(n=9)访谈,评估原型的设计、可用性和实用性。

结果

患者/照护者(n=18)报告称,原型是可用的(100%),它将促进医患沟通、共同决策和自我管理(100%),他们愿意尝试该系统并向其临床医生推荐(100%)。临床医生(n=9)认为,原型鼓励更好地利用患者评估进行决策和患者护理(100%),并改善了对护理事件与结局之间因果/时间关系的识别(100%)、患者状态监测(100%)、多学科团队沟通(100%)以及运营效率和患者护理质量(88.9%)。

结论

有效的评估、评估和沟通工具可以提高患者护理质量和运营效率。本项目开发了这样一种工具的电子版本。未来的工作将完善其在多个姑息治疗和临终关怀环境中的可用性和整合。

相似文献

1
A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care.提高姑息治疗和临终关怀的技术解决方案。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jan;20(1):167-74. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1086-z. Epub 2011 Jan 16.
2
Tell Us™: a Web-based tool for improving communication among patients, families, and providers in hospice and palliative care through systematic data specification, collection, and use.Tell UsTM:一种基于网络的工具,通过系统的数据规范、收集和使用,改善临终关怀和姑息治疗中的患者、家庭和提供者之间的沟通。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Oct;42(4):526-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
A Mobile App to Improve Symptom Control and Information Exchange Among Specialists and Local Health Workers Treating Tanzanian Cancer Patients: Human-Centered Design Approach.一款用于改善治疗坦桑尼亚癌症患者的专家与当地卫生工作者之间症状控制及信息交流的移动应用程序:以人为本的设计方法。
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;7(1):e24062. doi: 10.2196/24062.
5
Examining Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision Making and Subsequent Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.审视旨在支持姑息治疗中共同决策及后续患者结局的干预措施:文献系统综述
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;36(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/1049909118783688. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Improving hospice outcomes through systematic assessment: a clinical trial.通过系统评估改善临终关怀结局:一项临床试验。
Cancer Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):89-97. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f70aee.
7
Can short hospice enrollment be long enough? Comparing the perspectives of hospice professionals and family caregivers.短期临终关怀登记时间够长吗?比较临终关怀专业人员和家庭照顾者的观点。
Palliat Support Care. 2009 Mar;7(1):37-47. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509000066.
8
Understanding Palliative Care and Hospice: A Review for Primary Care Providers.了解姑息治疗与临终关怀:给初级保健提供者的一份综述
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Feb;92(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.11.007.
9
Hospice and Palliative Care: An Overview.临终关怀和姑息治疗概述。
Med Clin North Am. 2020 May;104(3):359-373. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.01.001.
10
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Undergoing Lung Surgery (PSA-Lung) was appropriate for symptom assessment after discharge.接受肺手术(PSA-Lung)适合出院后进行症状评估。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jul;33(7):1807-1818. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03636-w. Epub 2024 May 12.
2
Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review.评估旨在支持共同决策的康复技术可用性的方法:范围综述
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug 15;10:e41359. doi: 10.2196/41359.
3
Evaluating Nurses' Time to Response by Severity and Cancer Stage in a Remote Symptom Monitoring Program for Patients With Breast Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives in palliative care?姑息治疗的观点?
J Med Liban. 2008 Apr-Jun;56(2):129-31.
2
Pain management and health care policy.疼痛管理与医疗保健政策。
J Med Liban. 2008 Apr-Jun;56(2):105-11.
3
The conception of the Nankya model of palliative care development in Africa.非洲姑息治疗发展的南加模型构想。
评估远程症状监测计划中乳腺癌患者严重程度和癌症分期对护士响应时间的影响。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jun;7:e2300015. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00015.
4
Patient and clinician-reported experiences of using electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) as part of routine cancer care.患者和临床医生在常规癌症护理中使用电子患者报告结局测量(ePROMs)的报告体验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 May 4;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00544-4.
5
Measuring Pediatric Palliative Care Quality: Challenges and Opportunities.测量儿科姑息治疗质量:挑战与机遇。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):e483-e495. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
6
Neurological consultations via telemedicine for specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) at home and in hospice (TANNE project): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过远程医疗进行神经内科咨询,为家庭和临终关怀中的专科门诊姑息治疗(SOPC)提供服务(TANNE 项目):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 6;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01088-y.
7
Analyzing User Engagement Within a Patient-Reported Outcomes Texting Tool for Diabetes Management: Engagement Phenotype Study.分析糖尿病管理患者报告结局短信工具中的用户参与度:参与度表型研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Nov 14;7(4):e41140. doi: 10.2196/41140.
8
Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review.姑息性癌症护理中的电子患者报告结局(e-PROMs):一项范围综述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Sep 23;6(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z.
9
Examining the International Palliative Care Systems in Rural Areas: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study.审视农村地区的国际姑息治疗体系:一项比较案例研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):e36037. doi: 10.2196/36037.
10
A Proposed Patient-Inclusive Methodology for Developing and Validating Telehealth Surveys that Include Social Determinants of Health.用于开发和验证包含健康社会决定因素的远程医疗调查的患者包容性方法学建议。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:565-570. eCollection 2021.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008 Sep;14(9):459-64. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2008.14.9.31127.
4
Improving cancer pain management in Malaysia.改善马来西亚的癌症疼痛管理。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:24-34. doi: 10.1159/000143215. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
5
A "TNM" classification system for cancer pain: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP).一种癌症疼痛的“TNM”分类系统:埃德蒙顿癌症疼痛分类系统(ECS-CP)。
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jun;16(6):547-55. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0423-3. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said?医生与家庭护理人员之间关于临终护理的沟通:讨论何时进行以及讨论了什么?
J Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;8(6):1176-85. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.1176.
7
A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain.一项使用内容专家对晚期癌症患者疼痛分类系统进行的验证研究:埃德蒙顿癌症疼痛分类系统
Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):466-76. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1055oa.
8
Dying in hospital: medical failure or natural outcome?在医院死亡:是医疗失误还是自然结局?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Dec;22(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00362-1.
9
Impact of the Edmonton Labeled Visual Information System on physician recall of metastatic cancer patient histories. a randomized controlled trial.埃德蒙顿标记视觉信息系统对医生回忆转移性癌症患者病史的影响。一项随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Jan;21(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00239-6.
10
Clinical utility, factor analysis, and further validation of the memorial delirium assessment scale in patients with advanced cancer: Assessing delirium in advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者中纪念谵妄评估量表的临床效用、因素分析及进一步验证:评估晚期癌症中的谵妄
Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2859-67.