• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们是否需要全国性的电子汇总式护理记录?

Do we need a national electronic summary care record?

机构信息

Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2011 Jan 17;194(2):90-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04176.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04176.x
PMID:21241224
Abstract

Electronic referrals and discharge summaries can improve the quality and timeliness of clinical communication. The electronic summary care record (SCR) extends the concept of digital health summaries to create a perpetually updated and centrally stored summary of care, extracting key data from local systems after each encounter. The only major SCR evaluation to date, in England, found that rates of usage were low, and any impact on care was difficult to quantify. The SCR is seen by some as a first step to building a national distributed shared electronic health record (SEHR). However, the SCR may be a problematic diversion, creating a need for centralised databases, while the SEHR can function by sharing locally stored records, letters and discharge summaries. Uncertainty about the quality and provenance of SCR data raises concerns about patient safety, as key data may be absent and old data may persist, partly because of a lack of ownership of the summary. A national e-health strategy should emphasise the true stepping stones to a distributed and shared electronic record, including encouraging the uptake and meaningful use of electronic clinical records, clinical messaging, electronic discharge summaries and letters, and services such as decision support and e-prescribing, all of which have good evidence to support them.

摘要

电子转诊和出院小结可以提高临床沟通的质量和及时性。电子总结护理记录 (SCR) 将数字健康摘要的概念扩展为创建一个持续更新和集中存储的护理摘要,在每次就诊后从本地系统中提取关键数据。迄今为止,英国进行的唯一一项重大 SCR 评估发现,使用率很低,并且很难量化对护理的任何影响。SCR 被一些人视为构建国家分布式共享电子健康记录 (SEHR) 的第一步。然而,SCR 可能是一个有问题的转移,它需要建立中央数据库,而 SEHR 可以通过共享本地存储的记录、信件和出院小结来发挥作用。SCR 数据的质量和来源的不确定性引起了人们对患者安全的担忧,因为关键数据可能缺失,旧数据可能仍然存在,部分原因是对摘要缺乏所有权。国家电子健康战略应强调实现分布式和共享电子记录的真正步骤,包括鼓励采用和有效使用电子临床记录、临床信息、电子出院小结和信件以及决策支持和电子处方等服务,所有这些都有充分的证据支持。

相似文献

1
Do we need a national electronic summary care record?我们是否需要全国性的电子汇总式护理记录?
Med J Aust. 2011 Jan 17;194(2):90-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04176.x.
2
The eCollaborative: using a quality improvement collaborative to implement the National eHealth Record System in Australian primary care practices.电子协作:利用质量改进协作在澳大利亚初级医疗实践中实施国家电子健康记录系统。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Aug;26(4):411-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu059. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
3
Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study.在英格兰采用和不采用共享电子总结记录的情况:一项混合方法案例研究。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 16;340:c3111. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3111.
4
Communication at the interface between hospitals and primary care - a general practice audit of hospital discharge summaries.医院与基层医疗之间接口处的沟通——出院小结的全科医疗审核
Aust Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;42(12):886-90.
5
Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries.医院出院小结中药物记录的准确性:手动和电子出院小结中药物转录错误的回顾性分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jan;79(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 3.
6
Assessing the value of the Meaningful Use Clinical Summary for patients and families with pediatric asthma.评估有意义使用临床总结对小儿哮喘患者及其家庭的价值。
J Asthma. 2018 Oct;55(10):1068-1076. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1391283. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
From a paper-based transmission of discharge summaries to electronic communication in health care regions.从出院小结的纸质传输到医疗保健地区的电子通信。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.018. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
8
Electronic health records and online medical records: an asset or a liability under current conditions?电子健康记录与在线医疗记录:在当前条件下是资产还是负债?
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):59-65. doi: 10.1071/AH16095.
9
Timeliness and quality of surgical discharge summaries after the implementation of an electronic format.电子病历实施后手术出院小结的及时性和质量。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jan;207(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Evaluation of a shared electronic health record.共享电子健康记录的评估
Healthc Q. 2014;17(1):30-5. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2014.23779.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Third-Party Analytics Application Using Australia's National Personal Health Records System: Case Study.利用澳大利亚国家个人健康记录系统开发第三方分析应用程序:案例研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 24;6(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7710.
2
The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review.非预约护理期间查阅基层医疗患者记录的作用和益处:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 22;17(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0523-4.
3
Adoption of a Nationwide Shared Medical Record in France: Lessons Learnt after 5 Years of Deployment.
法国全国共享病历的采用:部署五年后的经验教训。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1100-1109. eCollection 2016.
4
Patient and public views on electronic health records and their uses in the United kingdom: cross-sectional survey.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录及其应用的看法:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 23;15(8):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2701.
5
Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol.患者和公众对电子健康记录在医疗保健、政策和研究中的看法调查:研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 23;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-40.