Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Mar;33(3):484-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
Telecare is advocated in most European countries with great, if not grandiose, promises: improving healthcare, lowering costs, solving workforce shortage. This paper does not so much question these specific promises, but rather the 'register of promising' as such, by comparing the promises with actual processes of incorporating technologies in healthcare practices. The case we study is the use of webcams in follow-up care from a Dutch rehabilitation clinic for people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This process shows many changes and contingencies, and corresponding shifts in goals and aims. The conclusion is that when innovative technologies such as telecare are actually put to work, 'the same' technology will perform differently. In order to function at all, technology has to be tamed, it has to be tinkered with to fit the practices of the users. The technology, however, is not meekly put to use (tamed), but is unleashed as well, affecting care practices in unforeseen ways. The untenability of pre-given promises and the fluidity of locally evolving goals has important implications for the way in which innovations are promoted, as well as for the way innovative technologies may be evaluated.
远程医疗在大多数欧洲国家得到提倡,承诺之多,不可谓不大:改善医疗保健、降低成本、解决劳动力短缺问题。本文并没有质疑这些具体的承诺,而是通过将承诺与技术在医疗实践中的实际融入过程进行比较,对这种“承诺登记”提出了质疑。我们研究的案例是荷兰一家康复诊所为严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者提供的网络摄像头后续护理的使用情况。这一过程显示出许多变化和偶然因素,以及目标和目的相应的转变。结论是,当诸如远程医疗等创新技术真正投入使用时,“相同”的技术将表现出不同的效果。为了发挥作用,技术必须被驯服,必须进行修补以适应用户的实践。然而,技术并没有被温顺地使用(驯服),而是被释放出来,以意想不到的方式影响护理实践。预先给定的承诺的不可行性和本地不断发展的目标的流动性,对创新的推广方式以及创新技术的评估方式都有重要影响。