• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较三种飞秒激光和微型角膜刀制作的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术角膜瓣。

Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 3 femtosecond lasers and a microkeratome.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.042.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.042
PMID:21241920
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the thickness and side-cut angle of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps created by 1 of 3 femtosecond lasers or a microkeratome using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

METHODS

Flap creation for bilateral LASIK was performed using an IntraLase (femtosecond group 1), VisuMax (femtosecond group 2), or Femto LDV (femtosecond group 3) femtosecond laser or an M2 microkeratome. Flap thickness was determined at 14 points. The side-cut angle was measured in 4 directions at the margin interface. Measurements were taken 2 months postoperatively using an RTVue Fourier-domain OCT device and integrated software.

RESULTS

Femtosecond group 1 comprised 50 eyes; femtosecond group 2, 40 eyes; femtosecond group 3, 64 eyes; and the microkeratome group, 52 eyes. Eyes in femtosecond groups 1 and 2 had relatively even flap configuration. Flaps in femtosecond group 3 and the microkeratome group had a meniscus shape. Flaps in femtosecond group 1 had the least difference between the mean peripheral and the central flap thickness (P<.001). The greatest flap thickness predictability (measured versus intended thickness) was in femtosecond group 3 (P<.001). Flaps in femtosecond group 1 had a side-cut angle closest to 90 degrees (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Flap morphology differed according to the system used. The 3 femtosecond laser systems appeared to be superior to the microkeratome system generally. The 3 femtosecond laser systems also produced different flap configurations depending on their individual mechanisms.

摘要

目的

使用傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估三种飞秒激光或微型角膜刀制作的激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)瓣的厚度和侧切角。

设置

韩国延世大学医学院视觉研究所眼科。

设计

比较病例系列。

方法

使用 IntraLase(飞秒组 1)、VisuMax(飞秒组 2)或 Femto LDV(飞秒组 3)飞秒激光或 M2 微型角膜刀为双眼 LASIK 进行瓣制作。在 14 个点测量瓣厚度。在边缘界面的 4 个方向测量侧切角。术后 2 个月使用 RTVue 傅里叶域 OCT 设备和集成软件进行测量。

结果

飞秒组 1 包括 50 只眼;飞秒组 2 包括 40 只眼;飞秒组 3 包括 64 只眼;微型角膜刀组包括 52 只眼。飞秒组 1 和 2 的眼睛瓣形态相对均匀。飞秒组 3 和微型角膜刀组的瓣呈新月形。飞秒组 1 的瓣中央和周边厚度差异最小(P<.001)。飞秒组 3 的瓣厚度预测性最佳(测量值与预期值)(P<.001)。飞秒组 1 的瓣侧切角最接近 90 度(P<.001)。

结论

瓣形态因系统而异。三种飞秒激光系统总体上优于微型角膜刀系统。三种飞秒激光系统因其各自的机制而产生不同的瓣形态。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 3 femtosecond lasers and a microkeratome.比较三种飞秒激光和微型角膜刀制作的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术角膜瓣。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.042.
2
Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.飞秒激光和微型角膜刀制作的角膜瓣的角膜结构,通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描成像。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.013.
3
Flap thickness reproducibility in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser: optical coherence tomography measurement.飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术中瓣厚度的可重复性:光学相干断层扫描测量
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):132-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.08.036.
4
Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of LASIK flaps: femtosecond laser vs microkeratome.前节光学相干断层扫描测量 LASIK 瓣:飞秒激光与微型角膜刀。
J Refract Surg. 2011 Jun;27(6):408-16. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20101029-01. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
5
Laser in situ keratomileusis flap measurements: Comparison between observers and between spectral-domain and time-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography.激光原位角膜磨镶术瓣测量:观察者之间以及频域和时域眼前节光学相干断层扫描之间的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.037.
6
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀在准分子原位角膜磨镶术中制作角膜瓣的比较及术后测量间隔对飞秒激光角膜瓣预估厚度的影响
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):833-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.038.
7
Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.使用机械微型角膜刀和飞秒激光制瓣的准分子原位角膜磨镶术术后角膜像差变化的比较:1年随访
Cornea. 2008 Feb;27(2):174-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815a50bf.
8
Analysis of microkeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.应用傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描分析微型角膜刀薄瓣结构。
J Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;27(10):759-63. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110812-03. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
9
Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.机械法准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)制作角膜瓣和飞秒激光制作角膜瓣后角膜曲率变化的测量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.023.
10
Control of femtosecond thin-flap LASIK using OCT in human donor eyes.利用 OCT 控制人供体眼角膜的飞秒薄瓣 LASIK
J Refract Surg. 2010 Jan;26(1):57-60. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20101215-09.

引用本文的文献

1
Femtosecond laser applications in corneal surgery.飞秒激光在角膜手术中的应用。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 8;13(3):293-305. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00083. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
Safety and Precision of Two Different Flap-morphologies Created During Low Energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.低能量飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术中两种不同瓣形态的安全性和精确性
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2023 Feb 21;18(1):3-14. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v18i1.12720. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
3
Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.
近视性准分子原位角膜磨镶术的结果:使用同一台准分子激光对三种不同飞秒激光与一种机械微型角膜刀的比较。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1047-1066. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00486-y. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Flap Thickness and the Risk of Complications in Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Literature Review and Statistical Analysis.机械微型角膜刀和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术中瓣厚度与并发症风险:文献综述与统计分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;11(9):1588. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091588.
5
Customized eye modeling for optical quality assessment in myopic femto-LASIK surgery.定制眼模型用于近视飞秒 LASIK 手术中的光学质量评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 6;11(1):16049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95730-z.
6
Why Use Ultrashort Pulses in Ophthalmology and Which Factors Affect Cut Quality.为什么在眼科中使用超短脉冲,以及哪些因素会影响切割质量。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 8;57(7):700. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070700.
7
Investigation of predictability and influence factors of the achieved lenticule thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.小切口微透镜切除术的预测性和影响因素的研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01374-4.
8
Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.威视FS200飞秒激光与Moria微型角膜刀制作的准分子原位角膜磨镶术瓣形态及可预测性的比较:一项眼前节光学相干断层扫描研究
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;33(2):113-121. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2018.0035.
9
Effect of age on visual and refractive results after LASIK: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser.年龄对LASIK术后视力和屈光结果的影响:机械微型角膜刀与飞秒激光的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 18;12(3):488-495. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.03.21. eCollection 2019.
10
Refractory interface haze developing after epithelial ingrowth following laser in situ keratomileusis and small aperture corneal inlay implantation.准分子原位角膜磨镶术和小切口角膜嵌体植入术后上皮内生后出现的难治性界面混浊。
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018 Jan 28;10:10-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.034. eCollection 2018 Jun.