• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断局限性前列腺癌治疗决策过程中的医患和医患关系。

Provider and partner interactions in the treatment decision-making process for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):851-6; discussion 856-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09945.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09945.x
PMID:21244609
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

• To evaluate the degree to which the partners of prostate cancer patients participate in the shared decision-making process with the patients' providers during the time between diagnosis and initiating treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• We recruited patients with newly diagnosed local-stage prostate cancer and their partners to complete take-home surveys after biopsy but before initiating treatment at urology practices in three states. • We asked partners to describe their roles in the decision-making process, including participation in clinic visits, and perceptions of encouragement from providers to participate in the treatment decision-making process. We also asked partners to rate their satisfaction with the patients' providers.

RESULTS

• Family members of 80% of newly diagnosed patients agreed to participate; most (93%) were partners (i.e. spouses or significant others). Most partners (93%) had direct contact with the patients' physicians. • Among the partners who had contact with providers, most (67%) were very satisfied with the patients' providers and 80% indicated that the doctor encouraged them to participate in the treatment decision. Overall, 91% of partners reported very frequent discussions with their loved one about the pending treatment decision, and 69% reported that their role was to help the patient make a decision. • In multivariate models, provider encouragement of partner participation was associated with higher partner satisfaction (odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.4-8.4) and an increased likelihood of partners reporting very frequent discussions with their loved one (odds ratio 6.1, 95% CI 1.3-27.7).

CONCLUSIONS

• Partners often attended clinic visits and were very involved in discussions about treatment options with both loved ones and providers. • Provider encouragement of participation by partners greatly facilitates shared decision-making between patients and partners.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺癌患者的伴侣在诊断后至开始治疗期间与患者提供者共同参与决策过程的程度。

患者和方法

我们招募了在三个州的泌尿科诊所接受活检但在开始治疗前的新诊断为局部阶段前列腺癌患者及其伴侣,让他们填写家庭作业式调查问卷。我们要求伴侣描述他们在决策过程中的角色,包括参与就诊以及对提供者鼓励他们参与治疗决策过程的看法。我们还要求伴侣对患者提供者的满意度进行评分。

结果

80%的新诊断患者的家属同意参与;大多数(93%)是伴侣(即配偶或重要他人)。大多数(93%)与患者的医生有直接联系。在与提供者有联系的伴侣中,大多数(67%)对患者的提供者非常满意,80%表示医生鼓励他们参与治疗决策。总体而言,91%的伴侣报告与他们所爱的人就即将进行的治疗决策进行了非常频繁的讨论,69%的伴侣报告他们的角色是帮助患者做出决策。在多变量模型中,提供者鼓励伴侣参与与伴侣满意度较高(比值比 3.4,95%CI 1.4-8.4)和伴侣更频繁地与所爱的人讨论(比值比 6.1,95%CI 1.3-27.7)相关。

结论

伴侣经常参加就诊,并非常参与与患者和提供者讨论治疗选择。提供者鼓励伴侣参与极大地促进了患者和伴侣之间的共同决策。

相似文献

1
Provider and partner interactions in the treatment decision-making process for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.新诊断局限性前列腺癌治疗决策过程中的医患和医患关系。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):851-6; discussion 856-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09945.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
2
[The role of next of kin in medical decision-making--empirical findings from haemato-oncological diseases].[亲属在医疗决策中的作用——血液肿瘤疾病的实证研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Aug;71(8-9):469-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202327. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
3
Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer.向男性及其伴侣提供个性化信息,以促进前列腺癌治疗决策的制定。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):107-14. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.107-114.
4
Evaluating a decision aid for patients with localized prostate cancer in clinical practice.在临床实践中评估针对局限性前列腺癌患者的决策辅助工具。
Urol Int. 2008;81(4):383-8. doi: 10.1159/000167833. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
5
Patient-centred care: What are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners?以患者为中心的护理:前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的经历是怎样的?
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Oct;73(1):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
6
Current decision-making in prostate cancer therapy.前列腺癌治疗中的当前决策制定
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 May;18(3):275-8. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fba5f2.
7
Partner understanding of the breast and prostate cancer experience.伴侣对乳腺癌和前列腺癌经历的理解。
Cancer Nurs. 2001 Jun;24(3):231-9.
8
Treatment decision making in prostate cancer: patients' participation in complex decisions.前列腺癌的治疗决策:患者参与复杂决策
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
9
Prostate cancer treatment decisions: a focus group exploration.前列腺癌治疗决策:焦点小组探索
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 Jan-Feb;25(1):97-104.
10
Choose wisely: therapeutic decisions and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer.明智选择:前列腺癌患者的治疗决策与生活质量
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jun;11(3):401-8. doi: 10.1188/07.CJON.401-408.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the diagnostic label for a low-risk prostate lesion: protocol for two online factorial randomised experiments.低危前列腺病变诊断标签的影响:两项在线析因随机对照实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):e085947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085947.
2
Quality of life assessment among ethnically diverse Black prostate cancer survivors: a constructivist grounded theory approach.不同种族黑人前列腺癌幸存者的生活质量评估:一种建构主义扎根理论方法。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01619-x.
3
Quality of Life Assessment Among Ethnically Diverse Black Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Approach.
不同种族黑人前列腺癌幸存者的生活质量评估:一种建构主义扎根理论方法。
Res Sq. 2024 Feb 20:rs.3.rs-3941497. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3941497/v1.
4
Designing for patient decision-making: Design challenges generated by patients with atrial fibrillation during evaluation of a decision aid prototype.为患者决策而设计:在评估一种决策辅助工具原型期间,房颤患者所产生的设计挑战。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Jan 6;4:1086652. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1086652. eCollection 2022.
5
Social ecological influences on treatment decision-making in men diagnosed with low risk, localised prostate cancer.社会生态因素对低危局限性前列腺癌男性治疗决策的影响。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13697. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13697. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
6
A comparison of general, genitourinary, bowel, and sexual quality of life among long term survivors of prostate, bladder, colorectal, and lung cancer.前列腺癌、膀胱癌、结直肠癌和肺癌长期幸存者的总体、泌尿生殖系统、肠道及性生活质量比较
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(2):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Disclosure in lesbian, gay and bisexual cancer care: towards a salutogenic healthcare environment.披露女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋癌症护理:迈向健康促进的医疗环境。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5895-7.
8
Factors underlying treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer in the U.S. and Canada: A scoping review using principal component analysis.美国和加拿大局部前列腺癌治疗决策的潜在因素:一项使用主成分分析的范围综述。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Jul;13(7):E220-E225. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5538.
9
Rethinking active surveillance for prostate cancer in African American men.重新思考非裔美国男性前列腺癌的主动监测。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S397-S410. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.06.19.
10
Effectiveness, cost-utility and implementation of a decision aid for patients with localised prostate cancer and their partners: study protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.局限性前列腺癌患者及其伴侣决策辅助工具的有效性、成本效益及实施:一项阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 15;7(9):e015154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015154.