School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Apr;22(2):280-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq205. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
Population-level mortality indicators can be useful outcome measures of diabetes care. Death registration systems serve as the main source of data for such measures. However, standard mortality indicators based on underlying causes do not adequately reflect the burden from diabetic renal disease.
This article presents findings from analysis of multiple causes of death available from death registration data for Australia and USA. Both countries use an automated system that applies prescribed rules to select and code the underlying cause for each registered death. Deaths with diabetes as underlying cause were grouped according to their diabetic complications as defined by the International Classification of Diseases. Age-standardized mortality rates were calculated for the underlying cause rubric 'diabetes with renal complications'. These were contrasted with rates calculated using additional deaths where diabetes was the underlying cause and renal failure was listed as a consequence.
These analyses identified that current automated programmes code three-fourths of all diabetes deaths to 'diabetes without complications', despite additional factors being listed. Estimated multiple cause death rates from diabetic renal disease are four to nine times higher than underlying cause rates for 'diabetes with renal complications' in both countries; and show a rising trend in contrast to the latter.
These findings indicate that routine underlying cause statistics for USA and Australia grossly under estimate mortality from diabetic renal disease. Clear guidelines on the certification, coding and statistical presentation of diabetes mortality are needed for epidemiology and health policy.
人群水平的死亡率指标可作为糖尿病治疗效果的有用衡量指标。死亡登记系统是此类指标的主要数据来源。然而,基于根本原因的标准死亡率指标并不能充分反映糖尿病肾病的负担。
本文介绍了对澳大利亚和美国死亡登记数据中多种死因进行分析的结果。这两个国家都使用一种自动系统,该系统应用规定的规则为每个登记的死亡选择和编码根本原因。根据国际疾病分类定义的糖尿病并发症,将根本原因是糖尿病的死亡进行分组。计算了“糖尿病伴有肾脏并发症”这一根本原因类目下的年龄标准化死亡率。将这些与使用糖尿病是根本原因且肾衰竭被列为后果的其他死亡计算的比率进行对比。
这些分析表明,尽管列出了其他因素,目前的自动程序仍将四分之三的糖尿病死亡编码为“无并发症的糖尿病”。两国中,糖尿病肾病的估计多因死亡比率是“糖尿病伴有肾脏并发症”的根本原因比率的四到九倍;与后者相比,呈上升趋势。
这些发现表明,美国和澳大利亚的常规根本原因统计数据严重低估了糖尿病肾病的死亡率。需要制定关于糖尿病死亡率认证、编码和统计呈现的明确指南,以用于流行病学和卫生政策。