Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl., Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
J Leukoc Biol. 2011 Apr;89(4):557-63. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0710409. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
Macrophages are now routinely categorized into phenotypic subtypes based on gene expression induced in response to cytokine and pathogen-derived stimulation. In the broadest division, macrophages are described as being CAMs (M1 macrophages) or AAMs (M2 macrophages) based on their exposure to TLR and IFN signals or Th2 cytokines, respectively. Despite the prolific use of this simple classification scheme, little is known about the precise functions of effector molecules produced by AAMs, especially how representative the CAM and AAM subtypes are of tissue macrophages in homeostasis, infection, or tissue repair and how plasticity in gene expression regulates macrophage function in vivo. Furthermore, correlations between mouse and human tissue macrophages and their representative subtypes are lacking and are a major barrier to understanding human immunity. Here, we briefly summarize current features of macrophage polarization and discuss the roles of various macrophage subpopulations and macrophage-associated genes in health and disease.
巨噬细胞现在通常根据细胞因子和病原体刺激诱导的基因表达来分类为表型亚型。在最广泛的分类中,巨噬细胞根据其暴露于 TLR 和 IFN 信号或 Th2 细胞因子的情况,分别被描述为 CAM(M1 巨噬细胞)或 AAM(M2 巨噬细胞)。尽管这种简单的分类方案被广泛使用,但人们对 AAM 产生的效应分子的确切功能知之甚少,特别是 CAM 和 AAM 亚型在稳态、感染或组织修复中代表组织巨噬细胞的程度,以及基因表达的可塑性如何调节体内巨噬细胞的功能。此外,缺乏小鼠和人类组织巨噬细胞及其代表性亚型之间的相关性,这是理解人类免疫的主要障碍。在这里,我们简要总结了巨噬细胞极化的当前特征,并讨论了各种巨噬细胞亚群和与巨噬细胞相关的基因在健康和疾病中的作用。