Faculty of Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 1;9:2515. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02515. eCollection 2018.
The process of macrophage polarization is involved in many pathologies such as anti-cancer immunity and autoimmune diseases. Polarized macrophages exhibit various levels of plasticity when M2/M(IL-4) macrophages are reprogrammed into an M1-like phenotype following treatment with IFNγ and/or LPS. At the same time, M1 macrophages are resistant to reprogramming in the presence of M2-like stimuli. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the macrophages polarization, plasticity of M2 macrophages, and lack of plasticity in M1 macrophages remain unknown. Here, we explored the role of Egr2 in the induction and maintenance of macrophage M1 and M2 polarization in the mouse and models of inflammation. Egr2 knockdown with siRNA treatment fail to upregulate either M1 or M2 markers upon stimulation, and the overexpression of Egr2 potentiated M1 or M2 marker expression following polarization. Polarisation with M2-like stimuli (IL-4 or IL-13) results in increased Egr2 expression, but macrophages stimulated with M1-like stimuli (IFNγ, LPS, IL-6, or TNF) exhibit a decrease in Egr2 expression. Egr2 was critical for the expression of transcription factors CEBPβ and PPARγ in M2 macrophages, and CEBPβ was highly expressed in M1-polarized macrophages. In siRNA knockdown studies the transcription factor CEBPβ was found to negatively regulate Egr2 expression and is likely to be responsible for the maintenance of the M1-like phenotype and lack plasticity. During thioglycolate-induced peritonitis, adoptively transferred macrophages with Egr2 knockdown failed to become activated as determined by upregulation of MHC class II and CD86. Thus, our study indicates that Egr2 expression is associated with the ability of unstimulated or M2 macrophages to respond to stimulation with inflammatory stimuli, while low levels of Egr2 expression is associated with non-responsiveness of macrophages to their activation.
巨噬细胞极化的过程涉及许多病理学,如抗癌免疫和自身免疫性疾病。当 M2/M(IL-4)巨噬细胞在用 IFNγ 和/或 LPS 处理后被重新编程为 M1 样表型时,极化巨噬细胞表现出不同程度的可塑性。同时,在存在 M2 样刺激物的情况下,M1 巨噬细胞抵抗重新编程。负责巨噬细胞极化、M2 巨噬细胞可塑性和 M1 巨噬细胞缺乏可塑性的分子机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们探索了 Egr2 在小鼠炎症模型中诱导和维持巨噬细胞 M1 和 M2 极化中的作用。用 siRNA 处理敲低 Egr2 后,刺激时不能上调 M1 或 M2 标志物,而过表达 Egr2 则增强极化后 M1 或 M2 标志物的表达。用 M2 样刺激物(IL-4 或 IL-13)极化导致 Egr2 表达增加,但用 M1 样刺激物(IFNγ、LPS、IL-6 或 TNF)刺激的巨噬细胞 Egr2 表达减少。Egr2 对于 M2 巨噬细胞中转录因子 CEBPβ 和 PPARγ 的表达至关重要,而 CEBPβ 在 M1 极化的巨噬细胞中高度表达。在 siRNA 敲低研究中,发现转录因子 CEBPβ 负调节 Egr2 表达,可能负责维持 M1 样表型和缺乏可塑性。在巯基乙醇酸盐诱导的腹膜炎中,用 Egr2 敲低的过继转移巨噬细胞未能被激活,表现为 MHC Ⅱ类和 CD86 的上调。因此,我们的研究表明,Egr2 表达与未受刺激或 M2 巨噬细胞对炎症刺激的反应能力有关,而低水平的 Egr2 表达与巨噬细胞对其激活的无反应性有关。