Galaal Khadra, Godfrey Keith, Naik Raj, Kucukmetin Ali, Bryant Andrew
Gynaecological Oncology, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK, NE9 6SX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD006812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006812.pub2.
Uterine carcinosarcomas are uncommon with about 35% not confined to the uterus at diagnosis. The survival of patients with advanced uterine carcinosarcoma is poor with pattern of failure indicating greater likelihood of upper abdominal and distant metastatic recurrence.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy and/or systemic chemotherapy in the management of stage III-IV persistent or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma.
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2, MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 2010. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.
Randomised controlled trials comparing adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in women with uterine carcinosarcoma.
We independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and progression-free survival and risk ratios (RRs) comparing adverse events in women who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in meta-analyses.
Three trials (579 women, of whom all were assessed at the end of the trials) met the inclusion criteria. Two trials (373 women with stage III-IV persistent or recurrent disease) found that women who received combination therapy had a significantly lower risk of death and disease progression than women who received single agent ifosfamide. There was no statistically significant difference in all reported adverse events, with the exception of nausea and vomiting, which affected significantly more women in the combination therapy group than in the ifosamide group.One trial found no statistically significant difference in the risk of death and disease progression in women who received whole abdominal irradiation and chemotherapy, after adjustment for age and FIGO stage (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.05 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.18 for overall survival and progression-free survival respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in all reported adverse events, with the exception of haematological and neuropathy morbidities, which affected significantly fewer women in the whole body irradiation group than in the chemotherapy group (RR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.16).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review are limited to two trials. In the primary treatment/ first line therapy of advanced stage metastatic uterine carcinosarcoma, as well as in recurrent disease, adjuvant combination chemotherapy with ifosfamide and paclitaxel should be considered. None of the included studies reported on quality of life.
子宫癌肉瘤并不常见,约35%的患者在诊断时已超出子宫范围。晚期子宫癌肉瘤患者的生存率较低,其失败模式表明上腹部和远处转移复发的可能性更大。
评估放疗和/或全身化疗在治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期持续性或复发性子宫癌肉瘤中的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane妇科癌症组试验注册库、CENTRAL、《Cochrane图书馆》2010年第2期、截至2010年5月的MEDLINE和EMBASE。我们还检索了临床试验注册库、科学会议摘要、纳入研究的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家。
比较子宫癌肉瘤女性辅助放疗和/或化疗的随机对照试验。
我们独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。在荟萃分析中,我们汇总了总生存率和无进展生存率的风险比(HRs)以及比较接受放疗和/或化疗女性不良事件的风险比(RRs)。
三项试验(579名女性,所有女性均在试验结束时进行了评估)符合纳入标准。两项试验(373名患有Ⅲ-Ⅳ期持续性或复发性疾病的女性)发现,接受联合治疗的女性死亡和疾病进展风险显著低于接受单药异环磷酰胺治疗的女性。在所有报告的不良事件中,除恶心和呕吐外,无统计学显著差异,联合治疗组中受恶心和呕吐影响的女性明显多于异环磷酰胺组。一项试验发现,在调整年龄和国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期后,接受全腹照射和化疗的女性在死亡和疾病进展风险方面无统计学显著差异(总生存率和无进展生存率的HR分别为0.71,95%CI 0.48至1.05和HR = 0.79,95%CI 0.53至1.18)。在所有报告的不良事件中,除血液学和神经病变外,无统计学显著差异,全身照射组中受这些影响的女性明显少于化疗组(RR = 0.02,95%CI 0.00至0.16)。
本综述的结果仅限于两项试验。在晚期转移性子宫癌肉瘤的初始治疗/一线治疗以及复发性疾病中,应考虑异环磷酰胺和紫杉醇的辅助联合化疗。纳入的研究均未报告生活质量情况。