Suppr超能文献

临终决策中的家庭因素:家庭冲突和代理关系。

Family factors in end-of-life decision-making: family conflict and proxy relationship.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0353. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined proxy decision-making regarding end-of-life treatment decisions. Proxy accuracy is defined as whether proxy treatment choices are consistent with the expressed wishes of their index elder. The purpose of this study was to examine proxy accuracy in relation to two family factors that may influence proxy accuracy: perceived family conflict and type of elder-proxy relationship.

METHODS

Telephone interviews with 202 community-dwelling elders and their proxy decision makers were conducted including the Life-Support Preferences Questionnaire (LSPQ), and a measure of family conflict, and sociodemographic characteristics, including type of relationship.

RESULTS

Elder-proxy accuracy was associated with the type of elder-proxy relationship. Adult children demonstrated the lowest elder-proxy accuracy and spousal proxies the highest elder-proxy accuracy. Elder-proxy accuracy was associated with family conflict. Proxies reporting higher family conflict had lower elder-proxy accuracy. No interaction between family conflict and relationship type was revealed.

CONCLUSIONS

Spousal proxies were more accurate in their substituted judgment than adult children, and proxies who perceive higher degree of family conflict tended to be less accurate than those with lower family conflict. Health care providers should be aware of these family factors when discussing advance care planning.

摘要

背景

很少有研究探讨过关于生命末期治疗决策的代理决策。代理准确性的定义是,代理的治疗选择是否与他们所代表的老年人的明确意愿一致。本研究的目的是探讨与两种可能影响代理准确性的家庭因素有关的代理准确性:感知家庭冲突和老年人-代理关系的类型。

方法

对 202 名居住在社区的老年人及其代理决策者进行了电话访谈,包括生命支持偏好问卷(LSPQ)以及家庭冲突的测量指标,以及社会人口统计学特征,包括关系类型。

结果

老年人-代理的准确性与老年人-代理关系的类型有关。成年子女表现出最低的老年人-代理准确性,而配偶代理则表现出最高的老年人-代理准确性。老年人-代理的准确性与家庭冲突有关。报告家庭冲突程度较高的代理人的老年人-代理准确性较低。家庭冲突和关系类型之间没有发现相互作用。

结论

与成年子女相比,配偶代理在其替代判断方面更为准确,而感知家庭冲突程度较高的代理人往往不如家庭冲突程度较低的代理人准确。医疗保健提供者在讨论预先护理计划时应注意这些家庭因素。

相似文献

1
Family factors in end-of-life decision-making: family conflict and proxy relationship.
J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0353. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
2
The reluctance to burden others as a value in end-of-life decision making: a source of inaccuracy in substituted judgment.
J Health Psychol. 2012 Mar;17(2):179-88. doi: 10.1177/1359105311414956. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
3
Family discord and proxy decision makers' end-of-life treatment decisions.
J Palliat Med. 2008 Oct;11(8):1109-14. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0039.
4
Similarity, agreement, and assumed similarity in proxy end-of-life decision making.
Fam Syst Health. 2013 Dec;31(4):366-81. doi: 10.1037/a0033372. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
5
6
"Thinking about it for somebody else": Alzheimer's disease research and proxy decision makers' translation of ethical principles into practice.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;21(4):337-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.014. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Family matters: dyadic agreement in end-of-life medical decision making.
Gerontologist. 2010 Apr;50(2):226-37. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp166. Epub 2009 Dec 27.
10
Family matters: effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision-making.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jan;62(1):175-82. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12610. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
"I Wish I Knew": Assessing Older Adults' Perceived and Actual Knowledge of Their Partners' End-of-Life Preferences.
Innov Aging. 2025 Apr 24;9(6):igaf038. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf038. eCollection 2025.
3
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
5
Measuring Goal-Concordant Care in Palliative Care Research.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):e305-e314. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.02.030. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Consistency in End-of-Life Care Preferences Between Hospitalized Elderly Patients and Their Primary Family Caregivers.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 3;14:2377-2387. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S283923. eCollection 2020.
7
The dyadic communication intervention is feasible and acceptable among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):389-396. doi: 10.1177/0269216320972043. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
8

本文引用的文献

1
Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1211-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901.
2
Do Older Adults Know Their Spouses' End-of-Life Treatment Preferences?
Res Aging. 2009;31(4):463-491. doi: 10.1177/0164027509333683.
3
The effects of race on patient preferences and spouse substituted judgments.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2009;69(1):31-54. doi: 10.2190/AG.69.1.c.
4
Advance directives and proxies' predictions about patients' treatment preferences.
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Jan;16(1):93-109. doi: 10.1177/0969733008097995.
5
Family discord and proxy decision makers' end-of-life treatment decisions.
J Palliat Med. 2008 Oct;11(8):1109-14. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0039.
7
Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Feb;55(2):189-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01045.x.
8
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
9
A national agenda for social work research in palliative and end-of-life care.
J Palliat Med. 2005 Apr;8(2):418-31. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.418.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验