• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近义语义联想和远义语义联想对词语生成的影响。

Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production.

机构信息

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Rd. Elkins Park, Philadelphia, PA 19027, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):32-43. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0009-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-010-0009-7
PMID:21264640
Abstract

One way to examine the dynamics of word processing is to investigate how processing is affected by the co-activation of similar words ("neighbors"). A unique prediction of attractor dynamical models is that near neighbors should exert inhibitory effects and distant neighbors should exert facilitative effects. In study 1, data from 62 unselected chronic aphasia patients revealed a higher rate of semantic errors for words with many near semantic neighbors and fewer semantic errors for words with many distant semantic neighbors. In study 2, this basic result was replicated in controls using a speeded picture-naming paradigm. Together, these two studies provide strong new evidence consistent with the attractor dynamics view of neighborhood effects. In addition, analyses of correlations between effect sizes and lesion locations, and comparisons with the existing literature on semantic deficits in aphasia and the speeded picture-naming paradigm, all provide converging evidence that the semantic error patterns found in the present studies were due to disruptions of cognitive control mechanisms.

摘要

一种研究文字处理动态的方法是考察相似词汇的共同激活(“邻居”)如何影响处理过程。吸引子动力学模型的一个独特预测是,近邻应该产生抑制作用,远邻应该产生促进作用。在研究 1 中,对 62 名未经选择的慢性失语症患者的数据进行了分析,结果表明,语义邻居较多的单词产生语义错误的速度较快,语义邻居较少的单词产生语义错误的速度较慢。在研究 2 中,使用快速图片命名范式在对照组中复制了这一基本结果。这两项研究共同为吸引子动力学观点的邻域效应提供了强有力的新证据。此外,对效应大小与病变位置之间相关性的分析,以及与失语症和快速图片命名范式中语义缺陷的现有文献的比较,都提供了趋同的证据,表明本研究中发现的语义错误模式是由于认知控制机制的破坏所致。

相似文献

1
Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production.近义语义联想和远义语义联想对词语生成的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):32-43. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0009-7.
2
Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.吸引子动力学与语义邻域密度:处理过程因近邻而减慢,因远邻而加快。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):65-79. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.65.
3
Effects of phonological and semantic deficits on facilitative and inhibitory consequences of item repetition in spoken word comprehension.语音和语义缺陷对口语理解中项目重复的促进和抑制后果的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1848-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
4
Neural mechanisms underlying the facilitation of naming in aphasia using a semantic task: an fMRI study.使用语义任务促进失语症命名的神经机制:一项 fMRI 研究。
BMC Neurosci. 2012 Aug 10;13:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-98.
5
BONEs not CATs attract DOGs: Semantic context effects for picture naming in the lesioned language network.骨骼而非猫吸引狗:受损语言网络中图片命名的语义上下文效应
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118767. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118767. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.天哪!阅读物体名称产生的干扰意味着在图片命名检索过程中存在竞争作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1229-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655699. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
The neural basis of inhibitory effects of semantic and phonological neighbors in spoken word production.语音产生中语义和语音近邻抑制效应的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1504-16. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00408. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Why is a named as and as ? Understanding the relationship between targets and errors in a speeded picture naming task.为什么将一个命名为 A,另一个命名为 B?在一个快速图片命名任务中理解目标和错误之间的关系。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb-Mar;41(1-2):18-50. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2315822. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
9
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
10
Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors.频率在词汇生成中的作用体现在哪里?来自失语症患者图片命名错误的见解。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Jun;25(4):463-92. doi: 10.1080/02643290701674851.

引用本文的文献

1
An efficient model for predicting human diseases through miRNA based on multiple-types of contrastive learning.一种基于多种类型对比学习的通过微小RNA预测人类疾病的有效模型。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Dec 14;14:1325001. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1325001. eCollection 2023.
2
Multiple sclerosis is associated with differences in semantic memory structure.多发性硬化症与语义记忆结构的差异有关。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Jan;38(1):42-57. doi: 10.1037/neu0000924. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Stimulus- and Person-Level Variables Influence Word Production and Response to Anomia Treatment for Individuals With Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.

本文引用的文献

1
A large, searchable, web-based database of aphasic performance on picture naming and other tests of cognitive function.一个大型的、可搜索的、基于网络的数据库,其中包含失语症患者在图片命名和其他认知功能测试中的表现。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 Sep;27(6):495-504. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2011.574112. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
Dissociations in performance on novel versus irregular items: single-route demonstrations with input gain in localist and distributed models.新颖与不规则项目表现上的分离:局域与分布式模型中输入增益的单途径演示。
Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul 8;29(4):627-54. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_16.
3
Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling.
刺激和个体变量对慢性脑卒中后失语症个体的单词产生和命名障碍治疗的反应的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Oct 17;65(10):3854-3872. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00527. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Neural sensitivity to semantic neighbors is stable across the adult lifespan.成人的一生中,对语义邻居的神经敏感性是稳定的。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jul 4;171:108237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108237. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
The Effect of Lexical Cohort Size Is Independent of Semantic Context Effects in a Picture-Word Interference Task: A Combined ERP and sLORETA Study.词汇群组大小效应在图-词干扰任务中独立于语义语境效应:一项事件相关电位(ERP)与标准化低分辨率脑电磁断层扫描(sLORETA)相结合的研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Dec 20;13:439. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00439. eCollection 2019.
6
Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition.互动语境调节了双语对语言和认知的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1022-1047. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000770. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
Predicting confrontation naming item difficulty.预测对答命名项目的难度。
Aphasiology. 2019;33(6):689-709. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1495310. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
White-matter pathways and semantic processing: intrasurgical and lesion-symptom mapping evidence.白质通路与语义处理:术中与病灶-症状映射的证据。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101704. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101704. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
Semantic interference in speech error production in a randomized continuous naming task: Evidence from aphasia.随机连续命名任务中言语错误产生的语义干扰:来自失语症的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(1):69-86. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1501500. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
A close call: Interference from semantic neighbourhood density and similarity in language production.千钧一发:语言产出中语义邻域密度和相似性的干扰
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):145-168. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0856-y.
失语症口语识别缺陷的理论:来自眼动追踪和计算建模的证据。
Brain Lang. 2011 May;117(2):53-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
4
Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.经颅磁刺激诱导的特异性与非特异性语义损伤。
Curr Biol. 2010 May 25;20(10):964-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.070. Epub 2010 May 6.
5
The ventral and inferolateral aspects of the anterior temporal lobe are crucial in semantic memory: evidence from a novel direct comparison of distortion-corrected fMRI, rTMS, and semantic dementia.前颞叶腹侧和下外侧部在语义记忆中至关重要:来自经失真校正 fMRI、rTMS 和语义性痴呆的直接比较的新证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Nov;20(11):2728-38. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq019. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
6
Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia.左前颞叶在语义词汇提取中的作用:基于体素的失语症语言症状映射研究
Brain. 2009 Dec;132(Pt 12):3411-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp284.
7
Elucidating the nature of deregulated semantic cognition in semantic aphasia: evidence for the roles of prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortices.阐明语义性失语症中语义认知失调的本质:前额叶和颞顶叶皮层的作用证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jul;22(7):1597-613. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21289.
8
Conceptual Hierarchies in a Flat Attractor Network: Dynamics of Learning and Computations.扁平吸引子网络中的概念层次结构:学习与计算的动力学
Cogn Sci. 2009;33(4):665-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01024.x.
9
Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain.语义性痴呆和语义性失语中语义认知的不同损伤:来自非言语领域的证据。
Brain. 2009 Sep;132(Pt 9):2593-608. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp146. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
10
Exploring multimodal semantic control impairments in semantic aphasia: evidence from naturalistic object use.探索语义性失语症中的多模态语义控制障碍:来自自然物体使用的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2721-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.020. Epub 2009 Jun 3.