Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):442-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1087.
To investigate the associations of plasma levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in type 1 diabetes and the extent to which any such associations could be explained by endothelial and renal dysfunction, low-grade inflammation, and arterial stiffness.
We prospectively followed 169 individuals with diabetic nephropathy and 170 individuals with persistent normoalbuminuria who were free of CVD at study entry and in whom levels of N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine, N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine, pentosidine and other biomarkers were measured at baseline. The median follow-up duration was 12.3 (interquartile range 7.6-12.5) years.
During the course of follow-up, 82 individuals (24.2%) died; 85 (25.1%) suffered a fatal (n = 48) and/or nonfatal (n = 53) CVD event. The incidence of fatal and nonfatal CVD and of all-cause mortality increased with higher baseline levels of AGEs independently of traditional CVD risk factors: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.30 (95% CI = 1.03-1.66) and HR = 1.27 (1.00-1.62), respectively. These associations were not attenuated after further adjustments for markers of renal or endothelial dysfunction, low-grade inflammation, or arterial stiffness.
Higher levels of AGEs are associated with incident fatal and nonfatal CVD as well as all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes, independently of other risk factors and of several potential AGEs-related pathophysiological mechanisms. Thus, AGEs may explain, in part, the increased cardiovascular disease and mortality attributable to type 1 diabetes and constitute a specific target for treatment in these patients.
探讨血浆晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)水平与 1 型糖尿病患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)和全因死亡率的相关性,以及这些相关性在多大程度上可以用内皮和肾功能障碍、低度炎症和动脉僵硬来解释。
我们前瞻性地随访了 169 例糖尿病肾病患者和 170 例持续微量白蛋白尿患者,这些患者在研究入组时无 CVD,且基线时测量了 N(ε)-(羧甲基)赖氨酸、N(ε)-(羧乙基)赖氨酸、戊糖素和其他生物标志物的水平。中位随访时间为 12.3(四分位距 7.6-12.5)年。
在随访过程中,82 人(24.2%)死亡;85 人(25.1%)发生致命(n=48)和/或非致命(n=53)CVD 事件。随着基线 AGEs 水平的升高,致命和非致命 CVD 的发生率以及全因死亡率均增加,且独立于传统 CVD 危险因素:危险比(HR)=1.30(95%可信区间=1.03-1.66)和 HR=1.27(1.00-1.62)。这些相关性在进一步调整肾功能或内皮功能障碍、低度炎症或动脉僵硬标志物后并未减弱。
在 1 型糖尿病患者中,较高的 AGEs 水平与致命和非致命 CVD 以及全因死亡率相关,且独立于其他危险因素和几种潜在的 AGEs 相关的病理生理机制。因此,AGEs 可能部分解释了 1 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病和死亡率增加的原因,并构成了这些患者治疗的特定靶点。