• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对促进结直肠癌筛查的定制化交互式计算机推送干预的随机对照试验:有时更多只是一样。

A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

机构信息

Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):284-99. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9258-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12160-010-9258-5
PMID:21271365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3265931/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been few studies of tailored interventions to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

PURPOSE

We conducted a randomized trial of a tailored, interactive intervention to increase CRC screening.

METHODS

Patients 50-70 years completed a baseline survey, were randomized to one of three groups, and attended a wellness exam after being exposed to a tailored intervention about CRC screening (tailored group), a public web site about CRC screening (web site group), or no intervention (survey-only group). The primary outcome was completion of any recommended CRC screening by 6 months.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in screening by 6 months: 30%, 31%, and 28% of the survey-only, web site, and tailored groups were screened. Exposure to the tailored intervention was associated with increased knowledge and CRC screening self-efficacy at 2 weeks and 6 months. Family history, prior screening, stage of change, and physician recommendation moderated the intervention effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A tailored intervention was not more effective at increasing screening than a public web site or only being surveyed.

摘要

背景

针对促进结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的定制干预措施,研究甚少。

目的

我们开展了一项随机试验,评估了一种定制的互动干预措施,以提高 CRC 筛查率。

方法

50-70 岁的患者完成基线调查,随机分为三组,并在接受有关 CRC 筛查的定制干预(定制组)、有关 CRC 筛查的公共网站(网站组)或无干预(仅调查组)后接受健康检查。主要结局是在 6 个月内完成任何推荐的 CRC 筛查。

结果

6 个月时筛查率无统计学显著差异:仅调查组、网站组和定制组分别有 30%、31%和 28%的患者接受了筛查。在 2 周和 6 个月时,接触定制干预与知识和 CRC 筛查自我效能的增加相关。家族史、既往筛查、改变阶段和医生建议调节了干预效果。

结论

与公共网站或仅接受调查相比,定制干预并不能更有效地提高筛查率。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.一项针对促进结直肠癌筛查的定制化交互式计算机推送干预的随机对照试验:有时更多只是一样。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):284-99. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9258-5.
2
Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices.定制的交互式多媒体计算机程序对结直肠癌筛查决定因素的影响:在医生办公室进行的一项随机对照试验研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
3
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Cost effectiveness of interventions to promote screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial.促进结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益:一项随机试验。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2011 May;44(3):101-10. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101.
5
Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.实施意图与结直肠癌筛查:在安全网诊所进行的一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
6
Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial.社会心理因素调整以解决结直肠癌筛查差异:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):204-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1623.
7
Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.扩展健康信念模型中的社会心理因素与后续的结直肠癌筛查
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
8
Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.促进结直肠癌筛查讨论:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.032.
9
Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia: A multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information.有结直肠肿瘤家族史的高危个体的结肠镜检查接受情况:一项关于个性化咨询与标准信息的多中心随机试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004303.
10
A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.一种比较印刷品和网络通讯在结直肠癌筛查中的随机对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):122-9. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1017.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring for Health Literacy in the Design and Development of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review.电子健康干预措施设计与开发中的健康素养定制:系统评价
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Sep 2;12:e76172. doi: 10.2196/76172.
2
Evaluating digital nudge interventions for the promotion of cancer screening behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估促进癌症筛查行为的数字助推干预措施:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04028-8.
3
Are behavioral economics interventions effective in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of evidence and meta-analysis?行为经济学干预措施在提高结直肠癌筛查参与度方面是否有效:系统评价和荟萃分析证据?
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0290424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290424. eCollection 2024.
4
Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults in Zuni Pueblo: Factors Associated with FOBT and Colonoscopy Utilization.祖尼族成年人的结直肠癌筛查:FOBT 和结肠镜检查利用的相关因素。
J Community Health. 2023 Aug;48(4):565-575. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01196-7. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者导向信息传递对结直肠癌筛查的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4529.
6
Economic Evaluation of Web- versus Telephone-based Interventions to Simultaneously Increase Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women.基于网络与电话的干预措施同时提高女性结直肠癌与乳腺癌筛查率的经济学评价。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):905-916. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0009. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Using Implementation Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies for the Delivery of a Cancer Prevention and Control Phone Navigation Program: A Collaboration With 2-1-1.利用实施映射制定癌症预防与控制电话导航项目实施策略:与 2-1-1 合作
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Jan;23(1):86-97. doi: 10.1177/1524839920957979. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.护士导航计划对促进结直肠癌筛查行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):112-124. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1448-z.
10
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估旨在提高美国结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.新型计算机决策辅助工具对结直肠癌筛查中共同决策的影响:一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):93-107. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10369007. Epub 2010 May 18.
2
The priority is screening, not colonoscopy.优先事项是筛查,而非结肠镜检查。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2117-8; author reply 2118. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.177584. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
3
Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening.闭门会议:医患关于结直肠癌筛查的讨论。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Nov;24(11):1228-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1108-4. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
4
Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.初级保健医生进行的结直肠癌筛查:2006 - 2007年的建议与实践
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 May 13.
5
Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: a systematic review.针对癌症风险和筛查的定制化信息:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):155-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 18.
6
Screening for colorectal cancer: the glass is half full.结直肠癌筛查:乐观地看还有希望。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):592-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153858. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
7
Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.医生鼓励进行结直肠癌筛查:一项关于强化诊室及患者管理对结直肠癌筛查依从性影响的随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):47-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.519.
8
HIV/STI risk communication: the effects of scenario-based risk information and frequency-based risk information on perceived susceptibility to chlamydia and HIV.艾滋病毒/性传播感染风险沟通:基于情景的风险信息和基于频率的风险信息对衣原体和艾滋病毒易感性认知的影响。
J Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;14(1):78-87. doi: 10.1177/1359105308097948.
9
Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, Canada--a replication study.加拿大安大略省一项测量结直肠癌筛查心理社会相关因素的调查的因子效度与不变性——一项重复研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Nov;17(11):3279-83. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0241.
10
Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening.结直肠癌筛查相关的四个因素在性别、种族和既往筛查情况方面的结构效度和不变性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep;17(9):2231-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0176.