Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6040, USA.
Aggress Behav. 2011 Mar-Apr;37(2):145-60. doi: 10.1002/ab.20377. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
This study explored the current psychological characteristics and criminal behavior history of individuals who retrospectively reported being bullies, bully-victims, victims, or controls (i.e. neither victims nor bullies) during their last 2 years of high school. College students (n = 960) completed measures of criminal thinking, aggression, psychopathy, and criminal behavior online. We predicted bullies and bully-victims would demonstrate the highest scores for criminal thinking, proactive aggression, psychopathy, and have the most criminal infractions. Bullies and bully-victims had significantly higher scores on criminal thinking, aggression, psychopathy, and criminal behaviors than victims or controls. Additionally, men were significantly higher in criminal thinking, aggression, psychopathy, and had more criminal acts than women. There were no gender by bully group interactions. Logistic regression analyses differentiated bully-victims from bullies. Bully-victims tended to be male, higher in criminal thinking, and higher in reactive aggression. In addition, bully-victims were distinct from victims, showing higher criminal thinking and higher proactive aggression.
这项研究探讨了那些在过去两年的高中生活中被 retrospectively 报告为欺凌者、欺凌-受虐者、受虐者或对照组（即既非受虐者也非欺凌者）的个体的当前心理特征和犯罪行为史。大学生（n=960）在线完成了犯罪思维、攻击性、精神病态和犯罪行为的测量。我们预测欺凌者和欺凌-受虐者在犯罪思维、积极攻击性、精神病态方面得分最高，并且犯罪违规行为最多。欺凌者和欺凌-受虐者在犯罪思维、攻击性、精神病态和犯罪行为方面的得分显著高于受虐者或对照组。此外，男性在犯罪思维、攻击性、精神病态方面的得分显著高于女性，犯罪行为也多于女性。在欺凌者群体中没有性别与欺凌行为的交互作用。逻辑回归分析将欺凌-受虐者与欺凌者区分开来。欺凌-受虐者往往是男性，犯罪思维水平较高，反应性攻击性较高。此外，欺凌-受虐者与受虐者不同，表现出更高的犯罪思维和更高的主动性攻击性。
