Mycology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 120 New Scotland Ave., Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Apr;55(4):1543-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01510-09. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
There are few multilaboratory studies of antifungal combination testing to suggest a format for use in clinical laboratories. In the present study, eight laboratories tested quality control (QC) strain Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and clinical isolates Candida albicans 20533.043, C. albicans 20464.007, Candida glabrata 20205.075, and C. parapsilosis 20580.070. The clinical isolates had relatively high azole and echinocandin MICs. A modified CLSI M27-A3 protocol was used, with 96-well custom-made plates containing checkerboard pairwise combinations of amphotericin B (AMB), anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CSP), micafungin (MCF), posaconazole (PSC), and voriconazole (VRC). The endpoints were scored visually and on a spectrophotometer or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader for 50% growth reduction (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)]). Combination IC(50)s were used to calculate summation fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) (ΣFIC) based on the Lowe additivity formula. The results revealed that the IC(50)s of all drug combinations were lower or equal to the IC(50) of individual drugs in the combination. A majority of the ΣFIC values were indifferent (ΣFIC = 0.51 to 2.0), but no antagonism was observed (ΣFIC ≥ 4). Synergistic combinations (ΣFIC ≤ 0.5) were found for AMB-PSC against C. glabrata and for AMB-AND and AMB-CSP against C. parapsilosis by both visual and spectrophotometric readings. Additional synergistic interactions were revealed by either of the two endpoints for AMB-AND, AMB-CSP, AMB-MCF, AMB-PSC, AMB-VRC, AND-PSC, CSP-MCF, and CSP-PSC. The percent agreements among participating laboratories ranged from 37.5% (lowest) for AND-CSP and POS-VOR to 87.5% (highest) for AMB-MCF and AND-CSP. Median ΣFIC values showed a wide dispersion, and interlaboratory agreements were less than 85% in most instances. Additional studies are needed to improve the interlaboratory reproducibility of antifungal combination testing.
目前鲜有关于抗真菌药物联合药敏试验的多中心研究,因此无法推荐一种适合临床实验室的格式。本研究中,8 家实验室采用改良 CLSI M27-A3 方案,对质控菌株近平滑念珠菌 ATCC 22019 及临床分离株白色念珠菌 20533.043、20464.007、光滑念珠菌 20205.075 和热带念珠菌 20580.070 进行了检测。这些临床分离株的唑类药物和棘白菌素类药物 MIC 值相对较高。试验采用的是含有两性霉素 B(AMB)、阿尼芬净(AND)、卡泊芬净(CSP)、米卡芬净(MCF)、泊沙康唑(PSC)和伏立康唑(VRC)的 96 孔定制棋盘式组合的药敏检测板。终点通过目测、分光光度计或酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)读取器进行判断,终点值定义为 50%生长抑制(50%抑制浓度 [IC(50)])。根据 Lowe 相加公式,计算联合药物的 IC(50),得出抑菌浓度指数(FICI)总和(ΣFIC)。结果显示,所有药物组合的 IC(50)均低于或等于组合中各药物的 IC(50)。大多数 ΣFIC 值为无关(ΣFIC=0.51-2.0),未观察到拮抗作用(ΣFIC≥4)。通过目测和分光光度读数均发现两性霉素 B-泊沙康唑对光滑念珠菌、两性霉素 B-阿尼芬净和两性霉素 B-卡泊芬净具有协同作用。通过两种终点判断,还发现了两性霉素 B-阿尼芬净、两性霉素 B-卡泊芬净、两性霉素 B-米卡芬净、两性霉素 B-泊沙康唑、阿尼芬净-泊沙康唑、卡泊芬净-米卡芬净和卡泊芬净-泊沙康唑具有协同作用。各实验室间的一致性在 37.5%(最低,阿尼芬净-卡泊芬净)到 87.5%(最高,两性霉素 B-米卡芬净和阿尼芬净-卡泊芬净)之间不等。中位 ΣFIC 值的离散度较大,大多数情况下,实验室间的一致性低于 85%。需要开展更多研究来提高抗真菌药物联合药敏试验的实验室间重现性。