• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟三年儿科监管情况。

Three years of paediatric regulation in the European Union.

机构信息

Paediatric Medicines, Human Medicines Special Areas Sector, European Medicines Agency, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;67(3):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-0997-4. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-011-0997-4
PMID:21286912
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the Paediatric Regulation has already succeeded in addressing the needs of the paediatric population both quantitatively with respect to paediatric development plans and trials, and qualitatively with respect to the content of the plans. The Paediatric Regulation No 1901/2006 entered into force in Europe on 26 January 2007, with the aim to improve the development of medicinal products, to address the lack of age-appropriate formulations and to provide information on efficacy, safety and dosing for the paediatric population. The Regulation requires applications for marketing authorisations to be accompanied by either a product-specific waiver or a paediatric investigation plan, to be agreed by the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the applications for Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) and Waivers submitted to the EMA, from 2007 until end of 2009, was performed. The content of scientific opinions adopted by the Paediatric Committee was compared to the proposals submitted by industry, and the paediatric clinical trials registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) database were examined.

RESULTS

An increasing paediatric medicine development can be expected following the adoption of this legal framework. The highest number of PIPs was in the fields of endocrinology (13.4%), oncology (11%) and infectious (10.8%) and cardiovascular diseases (7.1%), but most therapeutic areas now benefit from paediatric development. A large number of PIPs include measures for the development of age-appropriate formulations (23%), and most include studies on dosing, efficacy and safety to cover the respective paediatric subsets, including the mostly neglected neonates (26%). In many proposals (38%), however, the PDCO had to request major modifications to the proposed PIPs to ensure that the results will meet the needs, in particular by requesting better methodology. The proportion of paediatric trials as a percentage of all clinical trials has moderately increased (from 8.2 to 9.4% of all trials), and this may reflect the fact that paediatric trials are generally deferred (82%) until after adult development.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first analysis of the general impact of the Paediatric Regulation on the development of medicinal products in Europe. Three years after the implementation of the Paediatric Regulation, we were able to identify that the PIPs address the main gaps in knowledge on paediatric medicines. The key objective of the Paediatric Regulation, namely, the availability of medicines with age-appropriate information, is going to be achieved. It is clear also that modifications of the initial proposals as requested by the PDCO are necessary to ensure the quality of paediatric developments. The impact on the number of clinical trials performed remains modest at this point in time, and it will be of high interest to monitor this performance indicator, which will also inform us whether paediatric medicine research takes place in Europe or elsewhere.

摘要

目的

研究《儿科规定》是否已成功解决儿科人群在儿科发展计划和试验方面的数量需求,以及在计划内容方面的质量需求。2006 年第 1901/2006 号儿科法规于 2007 年 1 月 26 日在欧洲生效,目的是改善药物的开发,解决缺乏适合年龄的配方的问题,并为儿科人群提供有关疗效、安全性和剂量的信息。该法规要求营销许可申请必须附有产品特定的豁免或儿科研究计划,该计划必须由欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的儿科委员会(PDCO)同意。

方法

对 2007 年至 2009 年底提交给 EMA 的儿科研究计划(PIP)和豁免申请进行了回顾性分析。比较了儿科委员会通过的科学意见的内容与行业提交的建议,并检查了在欧盟药品监管机构临床试验(EudraCT)数据库中登记的儿科临床试验。

结果

预计在采用这一法律框架后,儿科医学的发展将有所增加。数量最多的 PIP 是内分泌学(13.4%)、肿瘤学(11%)、传染病(10.8%)和心血管疾病(7.1%),但现在大多数治疗领域都受益于儿科发展。大量 PIP 包括开发适合年龄的配方的措施(23%),并且大多数包括剂量、疗效和安全性研究,以涵盖各自的儿科亚组,包括最被忽视的新生儿(26%)。然而,在许多提案(38%)中,PDCO 必须对拟议的 PIP 进行重大修改,以确保结果满足需求,特别是通过要求更好的方法学。儿科试验占所有临床试验的比例适度增加(从所有试验的 8.2%增加到 9.4%),这可能反映出儿科试验通常会推迟(82%)直到成人开发完成。

结论

这是首次分析《儿科规定》对欧洲药品开发的总体影响。在实施《儿科规定》三年后,我们能够确定 PIP 解决了儿科药物知识方面的主要差距。《儿科规定》的主要目标,即提供具有适合年龄信息的药物,即将实现。显然,PDCO 要求的对初始提案的修改也是必要的,以确保儿科开发的质量。目前,这对进行临床试验的数量的影响仍然不大,监测这一绩效指标将很有趣,这也将告诉我们儿科医学研究是在欧洲还是其他地方进行的。

相似文献

1
Three years of paediatric regulation in the European Union.欧盟三年儿科监管情况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;67(3):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-0997-4. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
2
Enabling Development of Paediatric Medicines in Europe: 10 Years of the EU Paediatric Regulation.推动欧洲儿科药物的研发:欧盟儿科法规实施十年
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0261-1.
3
Paediatric investigation plans for pain: painfully slow!儿科疼痛研究计划:进展缓慢!
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;66(11):1091-7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0886-2. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
4
Oral medicines for children in the European paediatric investigation plans.欧洲儿科研究计划中的儿童口服药物。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e98348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098348. eCollection 2014.
5
Juvenile animal studies and pediatric drug development: a European regulatory perspective.幼年动物研究与儿科药物开发:欧洲监管视角
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Aug;92(4):254-60. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20310. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
6
Who are the PDCO?药品委员会(PDCO)成员都有谁?
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Feb;173(2):233-5. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2096-2. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
7
The European Regulation on medicines for paediatric use.《欧洲儿科用药法规》
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2007 Jun;8(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 30.
8
The EU paediatric regulation: still a large discrepancy between therapeutic needs and approved paediatric investigation plans.欧盟儿科规定:治疗需求与批准的儿科研究计划之间仍存在较大差距。
Paediatr Drugs. 2014 Oct;16(5):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0082-4.
9
Comparative analysis of the scope of European Union paediatric investigation plans with corresponding orphan designations.比较欧盟儿科研究计划的范围与相应孤儿药认定的比较分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 May;103(5):427-430. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313352. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Delays in completion and results reporting of clinical trials under the Paediatric Regulation in the European Union: A cohort study.欧盟《儿童用药规例》下临床试验完成和结果报告的延误:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):e1002520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002520. eCollection 2018 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-handling problems and expectations of the ideal pediatric drug-reported by children and their parents.儿童及其家长报告的药物处理问题和对理想儿科药物的期望。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 May;181(5):2161-2171. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04419-6. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Clinical Trials with Herbal Products for the Prevention of Dental Caries and Their Quality: A Scoping Study.草药制品预防龋齿的临床试验及其质量:范围研究。
Biomolecules. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):884. doi: 10.3390/biom9120884.
3
Clinical trials in neonates: How to optimise informed consent and decision making? A European Delphi survey of parent representatives and clinicians.

本文引用的文献

1
Paediatric investigation plans for pain: painfully slow!儿科疼痛研究计划:进展缓慢!
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;66(11):1091-7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0886-2. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
2
How children's responses to drugs differ from adults.儿童对药物的反应与成人有何不同。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;59(6):670-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02445.x.
3
Lack of appropriate formulations of medicines for children in the community.社区中缺乏适合儿童的药物剂型。
新生儿临床试验:如何优化知情同意和决策?家长代表和临床医生的欧洲德尔菲调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198097. eCollection 2018.
4
Availability of pediatric-evaluated formulations in Serbia.塞尔维亚儿科评估配方的可获得性。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2017 Mar-Apr;49(2):189-193. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_66_16.
5
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Moving toward a paradigm shift in the regulatory requirements for pediatric medicines.朝着儿科药物监管要求的范式转变迈进。
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;175(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2781-z. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Design and conduct of early phase drug studies in children: challenges and opportunities.儿童早期药物研究的设计与开展:挑战与机遇
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Nov;82(5):1308-1314. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13058. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Academic pediatric clinical research: factors associated with study implementation duration.学术性儿科临床研究:与研究实施持续时间相关的因素
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 29;16:36. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0138-y.
9
Off-label and unlicensed drug treatments in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: an Italian multicentre study.新生儿重症监护病房中的超说明书用药和未获许可药物治疗:一项意大利多中心研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;72(1):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1962-4.
10
Improving the outcome for children with cancer: Development of targeted new agents.改善癌症患儿的治疗结果:靶向新药的研发。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):212-20. doi: 10.3322/caac.21273. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
Acta Paediatr. 2003 Dec;92(12):1486-9. doi: 10.1080/08035250310006728.
4
Paediatric clinical trials: redressing the imbalance.儿科临床试验:纠正失衡
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003 Dec;2(12):949-61. doi: 10.1038/nrd1253.
5
Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies.儿科药物标签:提高儿科治疗的安全性和有效性。
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):905-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.905.
6
Lack of effect of the European guidance on clinical investigation of medicines in children.欧洲药品儿童临床研究指南未产生效果。
Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(11):1233-8. doi: 10.1080/080352502320777487.
7
Reported adverse drug events in infants and children under 2 years of age.2岁以下婴幼儿中报告的药物不良事件。
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):e53. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.e53.
8
Testing medications in children.在儿童中测试药物。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 31;347(18):1462-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr021646.
9
Large errors in the dosing of medications for children.儿童用药剂量存在重大误差。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1175-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200204113461518.
10
[The incidence of prescriptions without marketing product license in a neonatal intensive care unit].[新生儿重症监护病房中无上市产品许可证处方的发生率]
Arch Pediatr. 2000 Feb;7(2):143-7. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)88083-5.