Department of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 319 Chandlee Lab, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
J Clin Lipidol. 2009 Feb;3(1):19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.12.008. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
Dyslipidemia increases coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and often presents in diabetes, which amplifies risk of CHD. Lower fat (LF) diets increase triglyceride (TG) and decrease high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); moderate fat (MF) diets decrease TG and lower HDL-C less.
To quantify the magnitude of lipid and lipoprotein responses to MF versus LF cholesterol-lowering weight maintenance diets in subjects with and without diabetes.
A meta-analysis of 30 controlled-feeding studies (n = 1213 subjects) was conducted to evaluate LF versus MF diets on lipids and lipoproteins in subjects with and without diabetes.
In all subjects, MF and LF diets decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) similarly. MF diets decreased HDL-C less versus LF diets. The estimated increase in HDL-C after MF diets versus LF diets was 2.28 mg/dL (95% confidence interval 1.66 to 2.90 mg/dL, P < .0001). MF diets decreased TG, whereas LF diets increased TG. The decrease in TG was -9.36 mg/dL (-12.16 to -6.08 mg/dL, P < .00001) for MF versus LF diets. In subjects with diabetes, there was a similar increase in HDL-C (2.28 mg/dL) versus subjects without diabetes; however, there was a greater reduction in TG (-24.79 mg/dL, P < .05) on the MF diet. Subjects with diabetes had greater reductions in the total cholesterol (TC) to HDL-C ratio (TC:HDL-C) (-0.62, P < .0001) and non-HDL-C (-5.39 %, P < .06) after MF versus LF diets.
Both men and women had greater estimated reductions (6.37% and 9.34%, respectively) in predicted CHD risk after MF diets compared to LF diets. Moreover, based on greater reductions in TG, the TC:HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C in subjects with diabetes, the CHD risk reduction would be greater for a MF versus a LF weight maintenance, cholesterol-lowering diet.
血脂异常会增加冠心病 (CHD) 的风险,并且通常在糖尿病中出现,这会进一步增加 CHD 的风险。低脂 (LF) 饮食会增加甘油三酯 (TG) 并降低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (HDL-C);中脂 (MF) 饮食则会降低 TG 并降低 HDL-C。
定量评估有或无糖尿病的受试者采用 MF 与 LF 降胆固醇维持体重饮食的血脂和脂蛋白反应的幅度。
对 30 项对照喂养研究(n = 1213 名受试者)进行荟萃分析,以评估有或无糖尿病的受试者中 MF 与 LF 饮食对血脂和脂蛋白的影响。
在所有受试者中,MF 和 LF 饮食均可降低 LDL-C,效果相似。MF 饮食降低 HDL-C 的幅度小于 LF 饮食。与 LF 饮食相比,MF 饮食后 HDL-C 的估计增加量为 2.28mg/dL(95%置信区间 1.66 至 2.90mg/dL,P<.0001)。MF 饮食可降低 TG,而 LF 饮食则会增加 TG。与 LF 饮食相比,MF 饮食降低 TG 的幅度为-9.36mg/dL(-12.16 至-6.08mg/dL,P<.00001)。在患有糖尿病的受试者中,与无糖尿病的受试者相比,HDL-C 也有类似的升高(2.28mg/dL);然而,在 MF 饮食下,TG 降低更为显著(-24.79mg/dL,P<.05)。与 LF 饮食相比,患有糖尿病的受试者的总胆固醇(TC)与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)比值(TC:HDL-C)(-0.62,P<.0001)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(-5.39%,P<.06)的降低幅度更大。
与 LF 饮食相比,MF 饮食可使男性和女性的 CHD 风险预测值分别降低 6.37%和 9.34%。此外,鉴于糖尿病患者的 TG、TC:HDL-C 比值和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低幅度更大,与 LF 降胆固醇维持体重饮食相比,MF 饮食可能会带来更大的 CHD 风险降低效果。