Department of Microbiology, SydPath, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Feb;84(2):308-12. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0447.
We tested 513 stool samples from patients in Sydney, Australia for Blastocystis by using five diagnostic techniques: microscopy of a permanently stained smear using a modified iron-hematoxylin stain, two xenic culture systems (a modified Boeck and Drbohlav's medium and tryptone, yeast extract, glucose, methionine-9 medium), and two published conventional polymerase chain reaction methods specific for the small subunit ribosomal DNA. Ninety-eight (19%) samples were positive for Blastocystis in one or more of the diagnostic techniques. The PCR 2 method was the most sensitive at detecting Blastocystis with a sensitivity of 94%, and the least sensitive was microscopy of the permanent stain (48%). Subtype 3 was the most predominant subtype (present in 43% of samples assigned to this group). This study highlights the low sensitivity of microscopy when used as the sole diagnostic modality for detection of Blastocystis sp.
我们使用五种诊断技术检测了来自澳大利亚悉尼的 513 名患者的粪便样本,以检测 Blastocystis:使用改良的铁苏木精染色对永久性染色涂片进行显微镜检查、两种 Xenic 培养系统(改良的 Boeck 和 Drbohlav 培养基和胰蛋白胨、酵母提取物、葡萄糖、蛋氨酸-9 培养基),以及两种已发表的针对小亚基核糖体 DNA 的常规聚合酶链反应方法。在一种或多种诊断技术中,有 98 个(19%)样本呈 Blastocystis 阳性。PCR2 方法的检测敏感性最高,为 94%,而永久性染色显微镜检查的敏感性最低(48%)。亚型 3 是最主要的亚型(存在于 43%被分配到该组的样本中)。这项研究强调了在作为检测 Blastocystis sp.的唯一诊断方法时,显微镜检查的敏感性较低。