Suppr超能文献

消防员参与现场燃烧演练后冷却技术的比较。

A comparison of cooling techniques in firefighters after a live burn evolution.

机构信息

Center for Exercise and Health?Fitness Research, Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):226-32. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.545482. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the use of two active cooling devices with passive cooling in a moderate-temperature (≈ 22 °C) environment on heart rate (HR) and core temperature (T(c)) recovery when applied to firefighters following 20 minutes of fire suppression.

METHODS

Firefighters (23 men, two women) performed 20 minutes of fire suppression at a live-fire evolution. Immediately following the evolution, the subjects removed their thermal protective clothing and were randomized to receive forearm immersion (FI), ice water perfused cooling vest (CV), or passive (P) cooling in an air-conditioned medical trailer for 30 minutes. Heart rate and deep gastric temperature were monitored every 5 minutes during recovery.

RESULTS

A single 20-minute bout of fire suppression resulted in near-maximal mean ± standard deviation HR (175 ± 13 b min(-1), P; 172 ± 20 b·min(-1), FI; 177 ± 12 b·min(-1), CV) when compared with baseline (p < 0.001), a rapid and substantial rise in T(c) (38.2° ± 0.7°, P; 38.3° ± 0.4°, FI; 38.3° ± 0.3°, CV) compared with baseline (p < 0.001), and body mass lost from sweating of nearly 1 kilogram. Cooling rates (°C·min) differed (p = 0.036) by device, with FI (0.05 ± 0.04) providing higher rates than P (0.03 ± 0.02) or CV (0.03 ± 0.04), although differences over 30 minutes were small and recovery of body temperature was incomplete in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

During 30 minutes of recovery following a 20-minute bout of fire suppression in a training academy setting, there is a slightly higher cooling rate for FI and no apparent benefit to CV when compared with P cooling in a moderate temperature environment.

摘要

目的

我们比较了两种主动冷却装置与被动冷却在中等温度(约 22°C)环境下对消防员 20 分钟灭火后心率(HR)和核心温度(T(c))恢复的影响。

方法

消防员(23 男,2 女)在一次现场演练中进行了 20 分钟的灭火。演练结束后,受试者立即脱下热防护服,并随机接受前臂浸泡(FI)、冰水灌注冷却背心(CV)或在空调医疗拖车内进行被动(P)冷却 30 分钟。在恢复过程中,每 5 分钟监测一次心率和胃深部温度。

结果

单次 20 分钟的灭火导致平均心率(HR)接近最大值(175±13 b·min(-1),P;172±20 b·min(-1),FI;177±12 b·min(-1),CV)与基线相比(p<0.001),核心温度(T(c))迅速显著升高(P:38.2°±0.7°;FI:38.3°±0.4°;CV:38.3°±0.3°)与基线相比(p<0.001),出汗导致体重减轻近 1 公斤。冷却速率(°C·min)因装置而异(p=0.036),FI(0.05±0.04)提供的速率高于 P(0.03±0.02)或 CV(0.03±0.04),尽管在 30 分钟内差异较小,且所有组的体温恢复均不完全。

结论

在训练学院环境中灭火 20 分钟后 30 分钟的恢复期内,FI 的冷却速率略高,与 P 冷却相比,CV 无明显优势。

相似文献

1
A comparison of cooling techniques in firefighters after a live burn evolution.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):226-32. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.545482. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
6
Cooling Rates of Hyperthermic Humans Wearing American Football Uniforms When Cold-Water Immersion Is Delayed.
J Athl Train. 2018 Dec;53(12):1200-1205. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-398-17. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
7
Necessity of Removing American Football Uniforms From Humans With Hyperthermia Before Cold-Water Immersion.
J Athl Train. 2015 Dec;50(12):1240-6. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.1.05. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Acute cardiovascular effects of firefighting and active cooling during rehabilitation.
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Nov;54(11):1413-20. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182619018.
10
Physiologic and Perceptual Responses to Cold-Shower Cooling After Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia.
J Athl Train. 2016 Mar;51(3):252-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.4.01. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of cooling strategies for emergency personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(1):29492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15636-y.
3
Evaluation of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) weight on firefighter stamina, comfort, and postural stability.
Ergonomics. 2025 Apr;68(4):557-570. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2375026. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
4
Heat stroke management during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the experts in Japan (2nd edition).
Acute Med Surg. 2023 Apr 11;10(1):e827. doi: 10.1002/ams2.827. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Exploring First Responders' Use and Perceptions on Continuous Health and Environmental Monitoring.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064787.
6
Wayfinding of Firefighters in Dark and Complex Environments.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15):8014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158014.
7
Effects of firefighting hood design, laundering and doffing on smoke protection, heat stress and wearability.
Ergonomics. 2021 Jun;64(6):755-767. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1867241. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
The Impact of Wrist Percooling on Physiological and Perceptual Responses during a Running Time Trial Performance in the Heat.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 17;17(20):7559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207559.
9
Cooling intervention studies among outdoor occupational groups: A review of the literature.
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Nov;63(11):988-1007. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23175. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Heatstroke management during the COVID-19 epidemic: recommendations from the experts in Japan.
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Oct 4;7(1):e560. doi: 10.1002/ams2.560. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

5
Autonomic recovery after exercise in trained athletes: intensity and duration effects.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1366-73. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318060f17d.
7
Endurance training improves post-exercise cardiac autonomic modulation in obese women with and without type 2 diabetes.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jul;100(4):437-44. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0446-3. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
10
Active versus passive cooling during work in warm environments while wearing firefighting protective clothing.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Aug;1(8):521-31. doi: 10.1080/15459620490475216.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验